Is complexity an argument against design?

Splendid. So if you are one of those who "KNOW our Creator", then doubtless you can see this evidence and describe it to those of us less fortunate than yourself.

How amusing. A religious person, relying on religious arguments, wishes to cuss out a well-established branch of science. And the word with which he chooses to disparage it is ... "religion". As though that was the nastiest name you could call a thing.If I want to disparage creationism, I lump it in the same class as bullshit, garbage, and slime. When you want to disparage science, you lump it in the same class as ... your own most deeply-held beliefs.As though there was nothing worse than resembling you.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Nice attempt at changing the subject and ducking the point, but you fail. If you want me to laugh at the primitive ignorance of the Book of Job, I'll do that right after you've stopped running away from your silly boastful claims and answered my question.

Again, we see the religious person use "religion" as a disparaging term. Apparently the nastiest thing you can think of to say about the ToE is that it belongs in the same class as Christianity.You are, of course, wrong, but it's the psychology of the thing that fascinates me. Why do you use "religion" as your word to describe all that you think is bad and false?I mean, compare me with you. I have a scientific mind, and scientific opinions, and I value scientific knowledge highly. So when I want to attack creationism, do I say it's scientific? No, of course not, that would be stupid. I say it's a load of crap.You, meanwhile, are religious, spouting a religious viewpoint, using religious arguments from religious texts; and yet you use "religion" as a dirty word.Do explain. It can, however, be verified using the scientific method, as used by scientists.Which branches of science you choose to respect on the basis of your religious views is of no interest to me, to scientists, or, you'll notice, to the courts. What a strange thing to say. Why do you say it? I can see no relationship between your delusions that "some will now retract what they have said" and anything in my post --- or anything else in the real world, for that matter.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Hey, John 10:10.Remember this? I notice that you're still running away from this.If you know that there is no evidence for your views, why not give them up for the rubbish they are?If, on the other hand, you still really believe that there is evidence for your views, why don't you post some of it?