Has The Supernatural Hypothesis Failed?

Jon, I think you have the wrong idea about what the scientific concept of "falsifiability" actually means.Do you know what "falsifiable" means for a hypothesis or even a recognized established theory?General Relativity is falsifiable. Why?QCD and Evolution are falsifiable. Why?Whether it is your definition or Mod's definition, either one, "Supernatural" is not falsifiable. Why not?In science, a hypothesis that is not falsifiable has already failed. Why?

One of these days I am going to actually read all following messages before I spout off on one. Sorry Mod.

Easy there, big fella, I haven't seen that one yet so let's not be giving anything away.[Something germane to the thread ... yes ... well ...]If, by reading messages on a forum I could be physically transported into a film production that has already been completed, then this would certainly be a supernatural occurrence. And since it would be a supernatural occurrence with impact on our natural world then it should be falsifiable.Most unfortunate then that since all other claims of supernatural impact on our natural world have been found to be false I cannot hold out much hope that this one would be any different. And I was so hoping to have a film debut even if as a union scale extra.C'est la vie.