quote:
The specifics are human inventions. Only the ardent adherents of specific religions will dispute that.
Isn't RAZD disputing that ? Isn't that what the current Great debate with Bluegenes is about ?
quote:
But "consilience" demands that the common factors suggest "something".
A true consilience requires DIFFERENT lines of evidence,not just one, so there is no consilience here.
And the "something" suggested by the commonalities could as well be human psychology. Isn't that more likely than vague communications from an entity that has no interest in communicating ?