Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1180 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 684 of 1229 (622602)
07-05-2011 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ICANT
04-29-2011 12:05 PM


The ancient form of the Word: I AM - the ancient form of the Tetragrammaton
-
The translations that say anything other than I AM (for the Tetragrammaton); they were the translations left to the religions, scribes and pharisees.
Because,
The ancient form of the Word: I AM, was and is, the ancient form of the Tetragrammaton, and not the substitutions.
Because the words I AM that I AM, were pronounced meaning I AM the One LIVING Word [I AM] written with living white Light before Me'osheh.
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : re-edit
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ICANT, posted 04-29-2011 12:05 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 690 by ICANT, posted 07-05-2011 1:53 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1180 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 687 of 1229 (622609)
07-05-2011 11:33 AM


Existence is Permanence (of light of knowledge)
-
The statement spoken before Me'osheh (Mosheh), I AM THAT I AM,
is about Who IS the One that speaks to him,
And the One that speaks to him, speaks about Who Jhvh(Yhwh) IS, as identification Name, and the matter is not about to exist or not exist.
-
Existence is Permanence (of light of knowledge),
when there is no permanence of living white light - electric currents into the density of the brain - that gives knowledge,
then lack of knowledge is a termination of existence (permanence)
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1180 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 706 of 1229 (622987)
07-07-2011 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 690 by ICANT
07-05-2011 1:53 PM


Re: The ancient form of the Word: I AM - the ancient form of the Tetragrammaton
-
The Hebrew Word for 'I AM' is the Tetragrammaton as it is been viewed at Wikipedia, except that the transliteration of Jhvh/Yhvh is
Je = I
Haveh = Am
The name is JAH = Jeh
Jeh Jehavh (I AM THAT I AM)
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

This message is a reply to:
 Message 690 by ICANT, posted 07-05-2011 1:53 PM ICANT has not replied

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1180 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 707 of 1229 (622991)
07-07-2011 4:26 PM


The ancient form of the Word: I AM - the ancient form of the Tetragrammaton
-
By this one knows that both translation and transliteration were changed,
so that the name remained secret [sacred = untouchable; not usable by the trades of religions],
because of the evidences of the presence of the Jewd sound in the first and Ancient Hebrew language.
A Youd sound pertains to Modern Hebrew only.
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1180 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 708 of 1229 (622996)
07-07-2011 4:45 PM


both translation and transliteration were changed
-
If one ascertains that the sounds from the major languages did originate from one Language,
and that one Language ended up being mixed up,
then it is safe to say that the J sound was already in that first Language.
-
quote:
Evidence of a J sound in Ancient Hebrew Language consists in the fact that to mix the sound of the phonemes doesn’t mean to exterminate them; therefore, to confound the Language does not mean causing the sounds to disappear, but causing a change in the original order of the phonemes, altering the form that they are expressed. For this reason it has been proved the existence of a consonant J sound in the first and perfect Hebrew Language spoken by the descendence of Adam and Eva (Eve):
Because when one ascertains that the sounds or phonemes of the new Languages did not derive from nothing but from a unique Language,
then that's evidence the consonant J sound that had always been present in the new Languages also did not derive from nothing but was a part of a row of sounds:
the same volume of consonant phonemes that were mixed from the consonant sounds of a unique Language, first and perfect Hebrew Language.
-
-

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024