Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Existence
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 645 of 1229 (621492)
06-26-2011 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 642 by ICANT
06-25-2011 11:16 AM


Re: Whatever dude.
From a few lines in all your posts I do not believe you are one of those who believe the universe began to exist about 13.7 billion years ago out of an absence of anything.
Not trying to involve myself in your on-going misunderstanding, but here's a lecture from Lawrence Krauss about A universe from nothing.
In it he explains what is meant by "nothing" and/or "an absence of anything" in physics.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 642 by ICANT, posted 06-25-2011 11:16 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 646 by ICANT, posted 06-26-2011 2:07 PM onifre has replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 647 of 1229 (621506)
06-26-2011 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 646 by ICANT
06-26-2011 2:07 PM


Topology
Then why post?
To provide the video.
Is there anything outside of our present universe?
It falls back to the is there anything north of the north pole question. The question doesn't make sense, nor does your question. If you understood the topology of the universe, like you understand the shape of the earth, you would understand why "outside of the universe" is as nonsensical as asking "what's north of the north pole."
But to understand the topology of the universe requires a shitload of schooling, so it's better to just accept that the question is nonsensical and move on to other questions.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 646 by ICANT, posted 06-26-2011 2:07 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 649 by ICANT, posted 06-26-2011 3:47 PM onifre has seen this message but not replied

onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 660 of 1229 (622186)
07-01-2011 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 659 by ICANT
07-01-2011 2:21 PM


Re: Wasting time...
Maybe you can take the GPS system and explain to me how the clocks run much faster in the satellites due to gravity potentional than they are slowed by the velocity of the satellite. The clock actually runs 39 nanoseconds a day faster than a clock on earth at sea level. Yet you tell me my clock is running slower as observed by my wife.
Where the satellite's orbit, the curvature of spacetime due to the Earth's mass is less than it is at the Earth's surface. GR predicts that clocks closer to a massive object will seem to tick slower than those located further away.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 659 by ICANT, posted 07-01-2011 2:21 PM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024