Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence to expect given a designer
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 199 of 373 (646202)
01-03-2012 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by subbie
01-03-2012 3:46 PM


It is not ignorance.
Come on subbie, I know you are blinded with dislike for me but even you can see that that aerial inherently just doesn't require design.
I can literally cut a piece of metal and attach it to my radio, I have done it, and whether it looks squiggly for show or is just linear, the fact is that it's just a pedantic example, vacuous, doesn't even compare to a sophisticated circuit board.
I could throw a rock in a pond and call it, "design", or the rock could land in the pool but the definition would be so wide that it would be totally moot.
Sure- think evolution can produce design, but please, this is just silly. Why do you insult my intelligence? I have made these arials - they don't need design, or particular shape, or any thought, they in no way compare to the circuit board or a genome. No way, just no way, no matter how hard you fight it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by subbie, posted 01-03-2012 3:46 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by subbie, posted 01-03-2012 4:33 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 203 by bluegenes, posted 01-03-2012 5:10 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024