Hi iano,
Thanks for your reply. I thought you explained your points very clearly and succinctly. I hope I can provide a reply of similar quality.
You immediately however impose some rules and regs on what constitutes acceptable self-determining, ie: quickly revert to assumed absolute externals with words such as "wisdom" and "ridiculous" and "self-destructive".
If you look at my list, everything is based on "informed decision making." I take informed decision-making to be absolute for anything operating rationally. And that was the premise of my proposal--choose for yourself what "meaning" you want.
That is it. The meanings of "wisdom", "ridiculous", and "self-destructive" derive from that simple premise--make informed decisions. If you don't make informed decisions, I think you'll have a harder time finding "meaning". You'll more likely spend time in jail, paying child support, suffering some physical injury, or working at a job that doesn't give you "meaning" but you need in order to make ends meet.
Me and my Colt 45, we're not seen as valid.
I was specifically trying to avoid addressing this issue at all. Yes, you and your Colt 45s are valid. Absolutely. However, given how our society works, unless jail time is part of your "meaning", then your choice of "meaning" is unlikely to lead you to what you want. In that way, it's a "bad decision." If you are choosing what gives you meaning, you shouldn't choose things that you can't accomplish.
And if you don't agree with me then...
Bang! - your dead.
Cute.
But seriously, here's an important point--no matter if you're a relativist or not, there's crime. No matter how you choose your own meaning, there are killers, there are thieves.
The question is only, do you want to be one of them? And if so, why? Is it because of "meaning"? And is it something you really want to choose?
Like I said above, in prophex's case, I don't think becoming a thief is going to be a good choice for "meaning." And it's not a good choice for me either. So I'm not a thief.
Ben