If I recall correctly - and there's a chance that I do - Buzsaw believed that the serpent in the Garden of Eden was a dinosaur who lost his legs for deceiving Eve.
I remember him saying something like that. I forget who but someone kept trying to tell him that dinosaurs and snakes were not not simply different flavoured lizards but, well, I think we all remember how well fancy talk went down with ol' Buz.
Not quite the same place without him, though.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
™ Version 4.2
