Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 50 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,204 Year: 5,461/9,624 Month: 486/323 Week: 126/204 Day: 26/16 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Loony Of The Week
Larni
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 92 of 603 (729369)
06-10-2014 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by ringo
06-10-2014 12:21 PM


If I recall correctly - and there's a chance that I do - Buzsaw believed that the serpent in the Garden of Eden was a dinosaur who lost his legs for deceiving Eve.
I remember him saying something like that. I forget who but someone kept trying to tell him that dinosaurs and snakes were not not simply different flavoured lizards but, well, I think we all remember how well fancy talk went down with ol' Buz.
Not quite the same place without him, though.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by ringo, posted 06-10-2014 12:21 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 138 of 603 (743053)
11-26-2014 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by Tempe 12ft Chicken
11-26-2014 10:52 AM


Re: Megan Fox....No, not that one.
Seen it.
Died a little inside.
What a bellend she is.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Tempe 12ft Chicken, posted 11-26-2014 10:52 AM Tempe 12ft Chicken has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 90 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 175 of 603 (747569)
01-16-2015 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 171 by Faith
01-15-2015 11:47 AM


Re: Loonies Unlimited
Maybe your God could just ease up on the calamity?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Faith, posted 01-15-2015 11:47 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024