Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (9005 total)
41 online now:
Diomedes, dwise1, jar, PaulK, Tangle, xongsmith (6 members, 35 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,114 Year: 12,862/23,288 Month: 587/1,527 Week: 26/240 Day: 7/19 Hour: 2/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Peer Review Fails: Bad Science Papers of the Week
nwr
Member
Posts: 5623
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005


Message 24 of 27 (779707)
03-07-2016 10:09 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by NoNukes
03-07-2016 1:14 AM


To be completely honest, provided that the science in the paper is on target, aren't the editorializing comments secondary anyway?

I agree.

This seems to be an engineering paper. That is to say, it looks at hand coordination from an engineering perspective. And engineering is a design system.

Yes, the language used was unfortunate. But I think the criticism has been a tad excessive.


Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by NoNukes, posted 03-07-2016 1:14 AM NoNukes has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020