This, of course, is irrelevant to the issue of whether evolution is a good description of life on earth.
I seem to recall that you denied that there is any evidence in favor of evolution. I not only supplied a link that describes over two and a half dozen separate, independent lines of evidence in favor of evolution, but I even wasted an entire half hour composing what is my favorite line of evidence in favor of evolution.
The question is:
Do you agree that all known species can be classified in a nested heirarchical pattern? If not, why not?
If so, do you agree that this classification is not arbitrary, but is a pattern that will emerge no matter which characteristics we use to classify species? If not, why not?
If so, do you agree that if the theory of evolution were a fact, then life would exhibit this sort of heirarchical classification? If not, why not?
If so, the do you agree that this heirarchical classification is evidence for the theory of evolution? If not, why not?