Big Bang - Big Dud

I think the 1989 book might be the problem. It might as well be 1923.
These guys change their tune every time the waiter announces the soup of the day!
It's also not cool in their cult to say they are evolutionists, or not objective.
Using answers from creation science sites more than 6 months old is risky. They check them, concoct new mindbending pagan stories, and practice making fun of those who use them against their new, improved, imagined 'monopoly on science' doctrines.
Just to let you know what you're up against. To be fair, there are a bunch of nominal christian scientists types who pop up now and then and try to empasize the 'fair' aspects of the game. And who are eager to explain why, like their best friend evolutionists know, God is sick or dead, or otherwise totally out of the picture.

Eta
Amazing to me how all that comes out of your fountain is poison. Yet some hold you in respect here. Your name that cult, you can add to the list of your false assumptions! Keep up the filth, and empty posts, captain, it's good for people to see. Keep the fangs out.

quote:

---

Either put up or change your posting to reflect that just because a person can shoot holes in these answers does not have anything whatever to do with beliefs but with facts

---

Of course there's that as well. But I have noticed on these evo forums people often link to the latest evo refutations to creation science sites. I also noticed some people like to sling names like dork and imbecile, and idiot, etc. I didn't see you on their butts.

quote:

---

Please bring up a specific point on whatever you wish and we shall discussit.Fair enough?

---

Sounds fair.

quote:

---

You hide behind the nonsense to divert away from your lack of comprehension

---

Sounds very hard to dispute. Almost like a bulletproof high priest theory, where your sacred arguments are too high to be wasted on lower castes. Forgive me if I don't kiss the nethermost parts of your garments, and make it clear I think you could not overthrow the theory I proposed.

quote:

---

You never had a theory.

---

Maybe not, but it was more than you had any answers for, it seems.

He may not be the only one considered a "dork" and "imbecile". It's nice to be important, but more important to be nice. After all you guys are simply in denial that your veiw of science is a religion as well. At least that's the way I see it.

quote:

---

Arkathon doesn't have a chance of understanding anything about cosmology.

---

Since no one proved him wrong, maybe it's you who do not have much chance of understanding? Very brave, the little pep talk here, after suspending the guy without warning. Reminds me of some kids I knew in school.

quote:

---

Nice try, but dice I am afraid. If evolution is a religion, why are people of every religious affiliation
involved in its construction? Sorry, evolution is the result of eliminating religion from science, not the
other way around.

---

I might ask then why people of every religious affiliation are involved in it's destruction? Result of eliminating religion? About as much as catholics and protestests in Ireland are eliminating each other. Pure science is a different matter. You cannot put a blanket of pureness over all modern science, and every part of it. Much of it is belief biased and based.

quote:

---

This is false. The only people so involved are fundamentalist Christians.

---

No Percy you are false here. Here is a link for example to prove that. ::: The COLLAPSE of DARWINISM ::: Do you think there are not others in the world, such as some Jews etc as well?

quote:

---

I know of deists and buddists and people of many other
religions that support evolution. The ones that are trying to attack it are the literalist
dogmatists (doesn't matter the religion).

---

The moose made it sound like it was one sided. I don't think there is a list from all world beliefs showing either side. Call them what you like but the door swings both ways there.
Ned
No I wasn't planning to talk about the site. I only quickly looked at it. It was simply proving moose wrong. As far as JonF saying not all this or that, I don't think he can really know that. Sometimes you religiously zealous proponents of evolutionary orgins think the whole world is on your side. If I were you I'd content myself simply with not being extinct yet.

quote:

---

Seems to me the creation is a better source of information than any book

---

So then, you just look up at the creation, like the stars, and come up with things without any book? A superior type of stargazing! From this you can deduce that God did not make it all. Also that the book that tells us how He has done it, is not real. I thought it may have been a bad book, or books you were reading that had molded your opinion. Other ways? I'll say!

amen. don't let these evo witnessers get you down.

Yeah, you could be right. carry on