What would be enough proof for a creationist?

The PRobelm is not the transitional in essence but the background and foreground that said indiviuality is OBSERVERD in which contrasts with the outside world in ways that DO NOT lead to the same morphological SUBJECTIViTY within the brain of the taxonomist myopically viewing the shapes by blocking out the rest surround (looking in a microscope, etc). There is a psychological element here not needed if one is already established and effects up and comers and some hangers on but not the objective body of discussed work except in so far as it DID depend actually on Darwin's objectifie view in the community.

& this is concrete example of what I meant by "fore" and "back" GROUND. Nice post TC. Also it shows clearly why C/E goes critically beyond c or e by themselves as it must consist in TWO modeling thoughts at ONCE.