What would be enough proof for a creationist?

Hi LDSdude:First off, let me say that everytime I've seen your name, my mild dyslexia kicks in and I read it as LSD dude...sorry () I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Why does evolutionary theory need to disprove God? I interpret this along these lines:
To get a creationist to accept evolution, we would also have to disprove God, because God certainly did not start things off (with the Big Bang for example, or creating the "first" living thing) and then let evolution take over..
Is that your position? Because if it is then you are also saying that creationists will never accept the ToE...because the ToE in no way addresses any issue(s) what-so-ever relating to a supreme being.