Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What would be enough proof for a creationist?
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 27 of 63 (179732)
01-22-2005 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by PecosGeorge
01-22-2005 5:06 PM


Re: First Piece
You can say that again. Actually, don't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-22-2005 5:06 PM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-22-2005 7:07 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 53 of 63 (182460)
02-02-2005 12:36 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by LDSdude
02-01-2005 11:49 PM


First of all, see my signature.
LDS writes:
God could manipulate DNA or whatever to get the right animal, but it would mean he would have to guide the animal all the way to conquering it's parents.
I'm curious as to why you think this should be so. Also, does this mean that the dirt that cover much of the surface of this planet is only part of our imagination?
This message has been edited by Jacen, 02-02-2005 00:39 AM

People, please look at the Style Guide for EvC thread by Sylas. Pay particular attention to step 3.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by LDSdude, posted 02-01-2005 11:49 PM LDSdude has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024