I guess the way that I come off sounds "trollish" but my intentions are otherwise, please believe me.
Okay. Making very generalized simplistic statements without citing supports is what struck me as trolling.
Science can be very complex. Creationist websites way over simplify what science is. On the other hand creationist website's simplicty is easier to understand than science. A world wide flood is a notion that can briefly be used to "explain" a number of things. Science requires a lot of verified data and the findings and theories must be peer reviewed by other scientists in that field.
There are a number of ways that bones, plants, footprints, bugs, pollen have been preserved. I don't have the information or knack of condensing this down. A local flooding is one way of burying an animal. Falling into the ocean, or lake, or a river and being covered by mud and sediment is another. The various finds of fossils around the world have been cataloged and documented and subject to geological and other verification.
The statement that only a world wide flood could bury animals quickly enough is not a supported scientific theory. It has been repeatedly falsified. Those who put that theory forward have a religious not a scientific agenda. They want the Bible to be literally true so they can believe that that ancient world view is indeed true. If that is what you wish then go ahead and believe it. If what you seek is scientific fact then go and read what scientists have studied.
There are many world views. You pays your money and takes your choice.
Read over some of the threads you find here, use google, but your local libary is a better place to find information in my opinion. But I'll tell you animal bones did not lie around on the ground for hundreds of years being slowly covered up nor were they all buried in a world wide Noahic flood. They were buried within days to months and the processes of mineralization to cite only one kind of preservation process then took place over much longer periods of time.
lfen