Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8993 total)
72 online now:
ICANT, nwr, Pollux (3 members, 69 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,210 Year: 10,958/23,288 Month: 210/1,763 Week: 177/390 Day: 66/32 Hour: 0/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Uranium Dating
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 1057 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


(1)
Message 41 of 153 (573419)
08-11-2010 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by archaeologist
08-11-2010 8:04 AM


archaeologist??!! writes:

they cannot make the claim that this fish is an intermediary simply because all they have is a partial skull.......

Really?

They have a lot more than a partial skull. This is just one of the three found.

.......and no observation of it being produced by a lesser form and no observation of it changing into a superior form.

It is not a question of "lesser" or "superior".

They have preceding fish "forms", and later amphibian "forms" like Ichthyostega.

Tiktaalik has fins with wrists and simple digits. Fin/legs are a good illustration of transition.

{ABE} Realising that the topic is dating, I'll add that the discoverers of Tiktaalik were deliberately looking for such a creature in rocks that they knew were dated to the right period, demonstrating the validity of the dating.

Edited by bluegenes, : relating post to topic!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by archaeologist, posted 08-11-2010 8:04 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
bluegenes
Member (Idle past 1057 days)
Posts: 3119
From: U.K.
Joined: 01-24-2007


Message 44 of 153 (573500)
08-11-2010 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by archaeologist
08-11-2010 5:29 PM


Mess
Could you please sort this mess out, archaeologist?

Close quote boxes with [/qs], and preferably divide the post into separate replies to each of the posts you're replying to.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by archaeologist, posted 08-11-2010 5:29 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020