Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8993 total)
70 online now:
ICANT, nwr, Pollux (3 members, 67 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,211 Year: 10,959/23,288 Month: 211/1,763 Week: 178/390 Day: 67/32 Hour: 1/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Uranium Dating
Junior Member (Idle past 2025 days)
Posts: 27
Joined: 09-10-2010

Message 142 of 153 (587237)
10-17-2010 10:11 PM

I would like to add a claim if you will to this thread since i am not familiar with uranium-lead dating, so maybe someone can shine some light to this claim that was made by someone i encounter in the past. I haven't got this answer yet, so i hope someone can help collaborate on it.

As i understand, not all lead come from uranium, as they produce naturally throughout the environment. I had someone told me this would make lead unreliable. However, in this case, the half life of uranium will be used since there is no new sources to replenish uranium in the sample. Thus, the remaining of uranium will help determine the age of the sample.

Can someone help verify this claim?

And here is my next question concerning the half life problem:

It takes a very long time for uranium to decay into lead. Who even lived that long to observe this? If this is not how they determine the half life, then in what method do they use to determine the half life? I think it has to do with calculations.

Edited by faith24, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Nij, posted 10-17-2010 11:47 PM faith24 has not yet responded
 Message 144 by Chiroptera, posted 10-18-2010 7:32 AM faith24 has not yet responded
 Message 146 by JonF, posted 10-18-2010 9:04 AM faith24 has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020