Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   PROOF OF GOD
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 73 of 739 (116218)
06-17-2004 9:27 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Cold Foreign Object
05-13-2004 5:54 PM


Willowtree
The source of this inch, is the axis of the earth. 1/500,000,000th part of the earth's axis is equal to the sacred inch. The Metric system uses the circumference of the earth from the pole to the equator as it's source. Since that distance varies at different places measured, the most logical and accurate system of measurement then would be the sacred inch system, because the earth's axis doesn't change.
Well what an interseting bit of lore. Perhaps we could bring to bear just a little scepticism to the table.First we have this item
On one day, at the Vernal Equinox in the year 2141 BC, Alpha Draconus, the "Dragon Star" in the Draco constellation, was the pole star and it was so perfectly aligned with the descending passage, that if someone was at the bottom holding a mirror, that star would reflect that light.
I cannot yet say but I am downloading a software package that will allow me to reverse the night sky into the past while watching the constellations. I will be able to verify whether Alpha Draconus was indeed in the location necessary to qualify as the pole star but I think at the moment that such is not the case.
Regardless we need to also ask how they were able to determine the polar axis on a direct course through the center of the planet.Given that the north star was Alpha Draconus {yet to be verified} we need the other half of the equation which is a perfectly aligned star to determine the location of the south polar axis.
Now I do not believe that there is much in the way of likelihood of such a occuence actually coming together between the northern and southern skies.But in order for a proper determination of this,
The source of this inch, is the axis of the earth. 1/500,000,000th part of the earth's axis is equal to the sacred inch.
We require both these to be present otherwise we have no way of determining the actual axis of the Earth.{nor does anybody else.}
Please see if you can bring this information to the table while I run the software to determine locations of stars in 2141 B.C.
This message has been edited by sidelined, 06-17-2004 08:29 PM

You paddle your kayak up the river from your camp to fetch your camera which you left on a rock upstream a bit. The river flows at a uniform 2 mi/hr. You paddle (on still water) at a uniform 3 mi/hr. It takes 30 minutes to reach your camera. If you paddle all the way back to your camp, how long will the return trip take?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 05-13-2004 5:54 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-17-2004 9:39 PM sidelined has not replied
 Message 212 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-25-2004 4:09 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 98 of 739 (116590)
06-18-2004 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Cold Foreign Object
06-18-2004 7:05 PM


Re: Sex Sells Scott's Show
WILLOWTREE
Where is any refutation against the scholarship of Dr.Scott ?
By refutation do you mean show that the scholarship is not worth anything as far as giving him an advantage over,say, a PHD on physics or chemistry.
In the areas of physics and biology he would be hopelessly lost as we can see by a outline of his philosophy of education course.
Philosophy of Education
Degree Offered: PhD
It is expected that the philosopher of education trained at Stanford will be able to
1. analyze and clarify concepts and chains of reasoning used by teachers, researchers, administrators,
and policymakers;
2. assess arguments and clarify the rhetoric of educational debates;
3. identify implicit assumptions in such arguments or statements;
4. enter into productive exchange with researchers or policymakers in at least one branch of social or
human science;
5. place educational issues, and issues arising from the social sciences, into a broader philosophical
and sociocultural context.
Graduates of this SSE subconcentration traditionally become college or university professors of the philosophy of education in departments or schools of education. However, a few graduates have secured joint or courtesy appointments in a school of education and a department of philosophy because of the intensive training in the minor field of general philosophy (many students take a master's degree in philosophy or philosophy of science).
It is a certainty that he has a generalized overview of areas of social sciences and would be unable to argue in areas of the "hard sciences". This leads me to asking if we can continue discussion of the "sacred inch" we were engaging in earlier. I will endevour to keep in contact but I am in the middle of a move and I am working 7 days a week for probably the rest of summer so please bear with any delays.Talk at you later.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-18-2004 7:05 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 211 of 739 (118613)
06-25-2004 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 204 by Cold Foreign Object
06-24-2004 7:21 PM


Willowtree
From post 73
I'm actually glad to see you participate here Sidelined.
I will get back to this post of yours ASAP.
Just a little note to state that I am still awaiting your response

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-24-2004 7:21 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 217 of 739 (118749)
06-25-2004 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by Cold Foreign Object
06-25-2004 4:09 PM


WILLOWTREE
This is a quote from a previous post of yours.
Shove an imaginary pole through the Earth, and the distance from pole to pole can be chopped into 500,000,000 increments
we need the other half of the equation which is a perfectly aligned star to determine the location of the south polar axis.
Now I do not believe that there is much in the way of likelihood of such a occuence actually coming together between the northern and southern skies.But in order for a proper determination of this
Why do we need the other half ?
I made no claims about the 'southern' anything.
The descending passage is almost perfectly aligned with TRUE north star in 2141 BC.
In order for the distance to the pole to pole distance to be measured{of which the sacred inch is 1/500,000,000th part} it is necessary to determine where those poles are.Alpha Draconis {Thuban} was indeed the pole star in 2141,however it was not as close to earths polar axis as Polaris is today. The reason for the the locating of the southern pole star {Which could not have been located by the people in Egypt ever} is that this is the means by which we would be able to locate the southern pole which helps define the distance of the pole to pole rotational axis of the Earth necessary for accurately determining the sacred inch. Since we only have the location of north determined and not even very precisely then such a measurement is not very dependable is it?
Thuban's pole star position is given at this site
Page not found | Astronomy at Illinois
Among the best ever, however, was our Thuban, which was almost exactly at the pole in 2700 BC. It remained better than Kochab up to around 1900 BC, and was therefore the pole star during the time of the ancient Egyptian civilizations

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-25-2004 4:09 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 06-25-2004 5:51 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 220 of 739 (118762)
06-25-2004 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by jar
06-25-2004 5:51 PM


I was not arguing the use of the pole star for the purpose of direction of the north pole. Willowtree is trying to establish that the "sacred inch" is 1/500,000,000 th part of the pole to pole distance. The use of Thuban to determine this would not be enough on its own.So what the hell did they measure the 1/500,000,000th part of I cannot tell.
This message has been edited by sidelined, 06-25-2004 05:05 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by jar, posted 06-25-2004 5:51 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by jar, posted 06-25-2004 6:17 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 296 of 739 (120370)
06-30-2004 1:37 PM


Willowtree
Sorry I have been away for awhile but I was wondering if you could respond to my point in Post #217 concerning the determination of the sacred inch and if you could tell me your source that claims to have determined this sacred inch so that I may see for myself the way in which it was arrived at.

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-30-2004 2:37 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 454 of 739 (122796)
07-07-2004 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 451 by Cold Foreign Object
07-07-2004 6:31 PM


Re: REGARDING EVIDENCE
Willowtree
From your referenced site. http://www.thairuralnet.org/sunit/pyramid2.html we get this for example.
Piazzi Smyth discovered in 1865 that the proportion of the height to the width of the pyramid was 10:9 and amazingly if we rearrange the proportion to 109 time 5813 inches (the height of the pyramid), then we get the estimation of 91840 miles which is the mean of the radius of the earth’s orbit to the sun.
If by mean they are refering top average then they are so far off as to be pathetic. This is not even the mean of the radius of the moon to Earth.
The dimension of the pyramid is also very interesting. The height of the apothem is around 186 meters. If we use the number of Egypt mean geographical degree of 110,827 meters, divide it by the ancient measurement unit called stadium which equal to around 600 meters By this calculation (110827/600), we then have the answer of 184.72 or estimate to 185 meters, which almost equal to the height of the apothem.
Very interesting indeed since the measurement called stadia is a measurement of 12.5 inches or slight over one foot.This is off by a significant amount and renders the calculation made as useless.
The pyramid sides are slightly bowed in, and amazingly the curvature is the exact opposite of an earth’s curvature surface. Which mean if we could put the pyramid bowed side on the curvature surface of the earth, it will be exact fit in together.
This is amazing but unfortunately there are no calculations to show this as being so however since the Earth is an oblate spheroid we must first determine where on the planet that curvature is measured. Also considering the ratio of the Earth to the pyramid being so large I suspect the effective curvature of the Earth over 9131 inches would approximate a straight line to a high degree.
I will allow others to go on with other math errors in the site but I think you get the idea.

You see a book lying on a table. You know there's a force due to gravity acting on that book. If you take that force (on the book and due to gravity) as the "action," what then is the "reaction" as required by Newton's third law?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 451 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-07-2004 6:31 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 464 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-08-2004 3:00 PM sidelined has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 460 of 739 (122815)
07-07-2004 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 455 by Cold Foreign Object
07-07-2004 7:26 PM


Re: REGARDING EVIDENCE
Willowtree
The location of the great pyramid of Giza is at 30 degree 10’’ Longitude. And 30 degree Latitude. Which divide the Delta legion of Egypt into equal areas. The Delta legion is a term used by Greek for the part of Old Egypt which geometrically look like the letter Delta of Greek latter. This location of pyramid also located at the exact center of the Earth’s land mass
To continue on in rebuttal exactly how is the center of the Earths' land mass calculated on a sphere? The map does not do a very good job of providing evidence of this. Is the term mass actually appropriate to this point or are you speaking of land area? Do we include the land beneath the oceans of the planet?

You see a book lying on a table. You know there's a force due to gravity acting on that book. If you take that force (on the book and due to gravity) as the "action," what then is the "reaction" as required by Newton's third law?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 455 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-07-2004 7:26 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 484 of 739 (123111)
07-08-2004 9:09 PM
Reply to: Message 474 by Cold Foreign Object
07-08-2004 4:53 PM


Willowtree
Unlike the diagrams above, the earth is not perfectly spherical. It is slightly wider at the equator and slightly flattened at the poles. This is primarily due to the centrifugal force generated by the spin of the earth on it's axis. As a result, the curvature of the earth is greater towards the equator, and less towards the poles, causing the length of degrees of latitude to increase very slightly from the equator to the poles. The length of one degree of latitude from the equator to 1?/span> north is 68.71 miles. The length of one degree of latitude from 89?/span> north to the north pole is 69.4 miles. 68.71 miles is equal to 362776 feet, divided by sixty equals 6046 feet per minute of latitude, divided by two equals 3023 feet for one-half minute of latitude at the equator. This is the precise length of the perimeter of the Great Pyramid.
This is in conflict with the perimeter given at the website,
http://www.thairuralnet.org/sunit/pyramid2.html
which states one side equals 9131 inches which gives a perimetr of 36524inches equals 3043.666... feet
Just so we undestand the accuracy present in this.It is within 1% but that is not the same as precisely.

You see a book lying on a table. You know there's a force due to gravity acting on that book. If you take that force (on the book and due to gravity) as the "action," what then is the "reaction" as required by Newton's third law?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 474 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-08-2004 4:53 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 606 of 739 (126124)
07-20-2004 11:55 PM


Gentlemen I have discovered a website that is dealing with the same two people that Willowtree admires so much[Dr.scott and Dr. Rutherford] and danged if there aren't the occasional discrpencies.
Perhaps we can all take a look and find out wazzup?
http://www.19x19lc.com/0intro.htm
This message has been edited by sidelined, 07-20-2004 11:49 PM

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 645 of 739 (127968)
07-27-2004 1:30 AM


Willowtree
Satrting with post # 38 we have not resolved the determination of the so-called "sacred inch".
More about the sacred inch from another website.
http://www.prepare-ye-the-way.com/greatpyramid1.htm
The Great Pyramid was placed, not only at the exact center of the Nile delta quadrant, but, it is also placed at the exact center of all the land mass of the earth. That's right. Lines drawn north, south, east and west from the pyramid equally divide the earth's terrain. The longest land meridian, and the longest land parallel. The pyramid is aligned with True North, not magnetic north. Our closest achievement in that alignment is the Paris Observatory, it is six minutes of a degree off of true north. The pyramid is only three minutes off and that was proven to be the result of the land shifting and not by an error of the builders. True North is when you take the earth's axis and extend the north line out into space, it hits a point, usually a star, now it is Polaris.
There is what is called the "Precession of the Equinoxes". A twenty four to twenty six thousand year cycle, when, as this earth is spinning like a top, there is a wobble, the true north point in space, rotates, completing a circle in the heavens. Thus every so often the North star changes. Embodied within this pyramid is that knowledge. We're just starting to figure these things out. How in the world did the builders of the pyramid know these things? They did. On one day, at the Vernal Equinox in the year 2141 BC, Alpha Draconus, the "Dragon Star" in the Draco constellation, was the pole star and it was so perfectly aligned with the descending passage, that if someone was at the bottom holding a mirror, that star would reflect that light. A seeming total impossibility, but they did it. The basic unit of measure within the pyramid is the "Sacred Inch". This same inch, in the sacred cubit, is also used in Noah's ark, the Ark of the Covenant, Solomon's Temple and in the New Jerusalem. This inch is only a half of a hair's breadth different than the English inch and the American inch.
The source of this inch, is the axis of the earth. 1/500,000,000th part of the earth's axis is equal to the sacred inch. The Metric system uses the circumference of the earth from the pole to the equator as it's source. Since that distance varies at different places measured, the most logical and accurate system of measurement then would be the sacred inch system, because the earth's axis doesn't change.
To this I responded.
Willowtree
The source of this inch, is the axis of the earth. 1/500,000,000th part of the earth's axis is equal to the sacred inch. The Metric system uses the circumference of the earth from the pole to the equator as it's source. Since that distance varies at different places measured, the most logical and accurate system of measurement then would be the sacred inch system, because the earth's axis doesn't change.
Well what an interseting bit of lore. Perhaps we could bring to bear just a little scepticism to the table.First we have this item
On one day, at the Vernal Equinox in the year 2141 BC, Alpha Draconus, the "Dragon Star" in the Draco constellation, was the pole star and it was so perfectly aligned with the descending passage, that if someone was at the bottom holding a mirror, that star would reflect that light.
I cannot yet say but I am downloading a software package that will allow me to reverse the night sky into the past while watching the constellations. I will be able to verify whether Alpha Draconus was indeed in the location necessary to qualify as the pole star but I think at the moment that such is not the case.
Regardless we need to also ask how they were able to determine the polar axis on a direct course through the center of the planet.Given that the north star was Alpha Draconus {yet to be verified} we need the other half of the equation which is a perfectly aligned star to determine the location of the south polar axis.
Now I do not believe that there is much in the way of likelihood of such a occuence actually coming together between the northern and southern skies.But in order for a proper determination of this,
The source of this inch, is the axis of the earth. 1/500,000,000th part of the earth's axis is equal to the sacred inch.
We require both these to be present otherwise we have no way of determining the actual axis of the Earth.{nor does anybody else.}
Please see if you can bring this information to the table while I run the software to determine locations of stars in 2141 B.C.
This is your reply.
Message 212 of 631 06-25-2004 03:09 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well what an interseting bit of lore.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This was your comment concerning the determination of the unit of measure called the "inch".
I posted the evidence and my explanation with source.
For you to call it "lore" without refuting it is a bare opinion.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I cannot yet say but I am downloading a software package that will allow me to reverse the night sky into the past while watching the constellations. I will be able to verify whether Alpha Draconus was indeed in the location necessary to qualify as the pole star but I think at the moment that such is not the case.
Regardless we need to also ask how they were able to determine the polar axis on a direct course through the center of the planet.Given that the north star was Alpha Draconus {yet to be verified} we need the other half of the equation which is a perfectly aligned star to determine the location of the south polar axis.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This excerpt of yours is pertaining to how the starting benchmark date was arrived at.
What was the results of your search about which star was the North star in 2141 BC ?
My point still stands.
I have posted the evidence with source, a source who says those stars lined up as I have claimed in 2141 BC.
There are other websites that disagree with my sources in this issue and I am surprised nobody has offered these links. Until someone posts contradicting evidence with source my evidence stands unchallenged. So far I have only used Dr. Capt as a source. I will begin to cite some other heavy hitter sources shortly, and of course Dr. Scott is my source. All these people laughed at these claims UNTIL they looked.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
we need the other half of the equation which is a perfectly aligned star to determine the location of the south polar axis.
Now I do not believe that there is much in the way of likelihood of such a occuence actually coming together between the northern and southern skies.But in order for a proper determination of this
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do we need the other half ?
I made no claims about the 'southern' anything.
The descending passage is almost perfectly aligned with TRUE north star in 2141 BC.
The scored lines ALSO were in perfect alignment with Alcyone in Pleiades in 2141 BC. This makes 2141 BC the starting immutable benchmark date and commenses the prophetic chronograph. I submitted this evidence with source and nobody has posted their refuting evidence with source.
There is no way around it. No ancient human being possessed the ability to know or determine these things. Flinders Petrie was the first scientist using modern instruments to measure the Pyramid. This is the whole issue - this contrast of technology thousands of years apart.
It would be infinetly more easy to find a needle in a haystack the size of Rhode Island than to line up a passage with the North Star of 2141 BC - and we are led to believe ancient egpytians knew how. Why would they have to have this anyway ? Plus, why are there air shafts leading into the Kings Chamber which keep the chamber at a constant 68 degrees when unobstructed. Why does a dead Pharoah need air ?
Then the interior passage system perfectly symbolizes the exact message of the Bible. How many "coincidences" before an objective person bows to the obvious ?
Sidelined:
The measuring units between the north and south axis - are you disagreeing with this claim ?
Go ahead, but you need to acknowledge my evidence and source then show me yours.
Once again, what was the outcome of your computer search ?
My answer.
WILLOWTREE
This is a quote from a previous post of yours.
Shove an imaginary pole through the Earth, and the distance from pole to pole can be chopped into 500,000,000 increments
we need the other half of the equation which is a perfectly aligned star to determine the location of the south polar axis.
Now I do not believe that there is much in the way of likelihood of such a occuence actually coming together between the northern and southern skies.But in order for a proper determination of this
Why do we need the other half ?
I made no claims about the 'southern' anything.
The descending passage is almost perfectly aligned with TRUE north star in 2141 BC.
In order for the distance to the pole to pole distance to be measured{of which the sacred inch is 1/500,000,000th part} it is necessary to determine where those poles are.Alpha Draconis {Thuban} was indeed the pole star in 2141,however it was not as close to earths polar axis as Polaris is today. The reason for the the locating of the southern pole star {Which could not have been located by the people in Egypt ever} is that this is the means by which we would be able to locate the southern pole which helps define the distance of the pole to pole rotational axis of the Earth necessary for accurately determining the sacred inch. Since we only have the location of north determined and not even very precisely then such a measurement is not very dependable is it?
Thuban's pole star position is given at this site
Page not found | Astronomy at Illinois
Among the best ever, however, was our Thuban, which was almost exactly at the pole in 2700 BC. It remained better than Kochab up to around 1900 BC, and was therefore the pole star during the time of the ancient Egyptian civilizations
I did not recieve an answer from you but recieved one from jar as follows.
Why would anyone ever think that the Great Pyramid is aligned with the north pole (which they neither saw nor knew about) instead of the polar star which they could see?
The North Star was not important to the Egyptians because it was in the North, it was important because unlike all other stars, it did not move.
To this I said.
I was not arguing the use of the pole star for the purpose of direction of the north pole. Willowtree is trying to establish that the "sacred inch" is 1/500,000,000 th part of the pole to pole distance. The use of Thuban to determine this would not be enough on its own.So what the hell did they measure the 1/500,000,000th part of I cannot tell.
Now I am going to place the burden upon you to find out how your source was able to determine the sacred inch without first measuring the physical distance from pole to pole and explain how the location of the south pole was determined.
Every measurement throughout this thread centers around the veracity of this sacred inch.If your sources cannot show how they made the determination then their own expertise is highly suspect.

Replies to this message:
 Message 646 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-27-2004 3:09 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 647 of 739 (128115)
07-27-2004 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 646 by Cold Foreign Object
07-27-2004 3:09 PM


Willowtree
The source of this inch, is the axis of the earth. 1/500,000,000th part of the earth's axis is equal to the sacred inch.
As long as you are aware that in order to do so you must specify the way in which they determined the precise location of both the north and south poles and the way in which they they divided that measure into 500,000,000 parts to arrive at the sacred inch all from Egypt.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 646 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-27-2004 3:09 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 648 by NosyNed, posted 07-27-2004 3:50 PM sidelined has replied
 Message 651 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-27-2004 4:45 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 649 of 739 (128128)
07-27-2004 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 648 by NosyNed
07-27-2004 3:50 PM


Re: SI
NosyNed
I think you will find that the official distance between poles is what is used
This is why I asked for specifications for how the number was arrived at.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 648 by NosyNed, posted 07-27-2004 3:50 PM NosyNed has not replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 652 of 739 (128158)
07-27-2004 5:51 PM
Reply to: Message 651 by Cold Foreign Object
07-27-2004 4:45 PM


Willowtree
Post 220
Post 258
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, WILLOWTREE, try again, unless you are saying the bible is incorrect. All of those things were designed using the CUBIT as a measurement unit. The KJV uses cubits, and my NIV uses feet, but footnotes that the original unit was cubits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is a cubit ?
Royal Cubit = 20.63 British inches.
Sacred Cubit = 25.0266 British inches. This cubit is divided into 25 equal parts called the "inch" and this inch = 1.001064 British inches.
Source: Dr. Adam Rutherford "Pyramidology Book 1 chapter V"
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ancient cubit is the length from elbow to longest fingertip (not much of a standard).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed.
But this is not true.
In the chamber called "Ante-Chamber" there is a "raised Boss" in the shape of a horseshoe.
This Boss is exactly 5 sacred inches in length and 1 sacred inches in raised height.
Thus 5 x 5 becomes the length of the sacred cubit which said length is determined by its standard unit of measure revealed in the raised height of the Boss - 1 inch.
This Ante-Chamber, which is the chamber that precedes the Kings Chamber has a raised ceiling. It is in this room which scientists have determined that both the Royal Cubit and the Sacred Cubit are BOTH employed as the measuring unit and BOTH are accurate.
Excerpt from "Pyramidology Book 1" by Dr. Adam Rutherford (pages 75,76)
"On making a scientific examination of the Sacred Cubit in the Pyramid, it is found to bear an exact relationship to the size of the Earth. This cubit is discovered to be the exact 10,000,000th of the mean distance from the center of the Earth to the Poles, or in othe words the precise 10,000,000th part of the Earth's semi-polar diameter. The results of the latest geodetic research since the International Geophysical Year 1957-8 reveal that the mean polar radius of the Earth, as deduced from observation of the orbits of artificial Earth satellites is 3949.9 miles. Dividing this figure by 10,000,000, the result is 25.0266 British inches (corrected to four places of decimals), the precise length of the Sacred Cubit of the Great Pyramid.
Thus the Earth's mean polar radius measures 10,000,000 Sacred Cubits or 250,000,000 Pyramid inches; hence the Pyramid inch is the 500,000,000th of the Earth's polar diameter.
French savants conceived the idea of instituting a unit of linear measure based upon the size of the Earth, and invented the meter, which from a scientific standpoint is very faulty.
The French meter was arrived by taking 10,000,000 part of the so called quadrant of the Earth as calculated from the North Pole to the Equator, along a meridian passing through Dunkirk. The Earth IS NOT a perfect sphere, the said distance is not a true quadrant, hence it is not truly scientific to determine a unit of straight measure from such a curved surface.
Scientifically, a unit of straight measure should be based on the straight distance corresponding to the curved semi-meridian, namely the semi-axis or polar radius of the Earth, as has been done correctly in the case of this Sacred Cubit.
Furthermore, the Earth's axis is the only LONG CONSTANT NATURAL STRAIGHT LINE on our planet, and it is also truly international, for all nations rotate round it once every day. How appropriate that the Pyramid's units of measurement should be accurately based upon it !
Thus the Designer of the Pyramid long forestalled modern man in the scientific idea of having a unit of measure based on the size of the Earth. Indeed, the Pyramid's Sacred Cubit is really the French meter scientifically and mathematically corrected over 4,000 years before the French scientists even thought of the idea of having a unit of linear measure based on the dimensions of the Globe.
When the meter was brought into existence, a French mathematician named M. Callet in his book "Logarithmus", published in 1795, suggested that the meter should be the 10,000,000th of the Earth's mean polar radius instead of being based on the irregularly curved surface of the Earth. Without being aware of it, M. Callet was suggesting the truly scientific Sacred Cubit in the design of the Great Pyramid." END RUTHERFORD QUOTE.
Today the British inch is only 1/1000th of an inch shorter than the Sacred/Pyramid inch. Not bad for thousands of years.
Back to the larger point:
How did camel riding egyptians know any of this ?
They didn't. They only did if you just say so.
All the evidence combined proves the God of the Bible and His existence.
The area I have in italics is the hingepin in this debate.Dr. Rutherford has made this statement
[qs] making a scientific examination of the Sacred Cubit in the Pyramid, it is found to bear an exact relationship to the size of the Earth. This cubit is discovered to be the exact 10,000,000th of the mean distance qsfrom the center of the Earth to the Poles[qs] He fails here to inform us of what scientific examination allows us to "discover" {rather than make up} an exact relationship.We are left in a void concerning how this was arrived at,understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 651 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-27-2004 4:45 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 654 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-27-2004 6:45 PM sidelined has replied

sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 655 of 739 (128245)
07-28-2004 12:43 AM
Reply to: Message 654 by Cold Foreign Object
07-27-2004 6:45 PM


Willowtree
We still have not established that the Egyptians had this sacred inch since they neither had access to the IGY data nor did they have anyway of determining the length of the Earth's axis.I would postulate that the sacred inch is a fabrication since it is easily fabicated by manipulating the data to arrive at the sacred inch.
Now in 2141 B.C. Thuban{Alpha Draconis} was more than 2.5 degrees from celestial north so there is no way they could have used this to establish anything of accuracy.I also came across this in reviewing our posts.
There is what is called the "Precession of the Equinoxes". A twenty four to twenty six thousand year cycle, when, as this earth is spinning like a top, there is a wobble, the true north point in space, rotates, completing a circle in the heavens. Thus every so often the North star changes. Embodied within this pyramid is that knowledge. We're just starting to figure these things out. How in the world did the builders of the pyramid know these things? They did. On one day, at the Vernal Equinox in the year 2141 BC, Alpha Draconus, the "Dragon Star" in the Draco constellation, was the pole star and it was so perfectly aligned with the descending passage, that if someone was at the bottom holding a mirror, that star would reflect that light. A seeming total impossibility, but they did it
What do you mean the star would reflect the light? How on Earth do you suppose they determined that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 654 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-27-2004 6:45 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 656 by FrankM, posted 07-28-2004 2:18 PM sidelined has not replied
 Message 674 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-30-2004 6:52 PM sidelined has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024