Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   PROOF OF GOD
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 322 of 739 (120814)
07-01-2004 12:32 PM


This discussion has been very instructive. It is a lesson that has to be learned here over and over again. From the point of view of the participants, debating with someone who's making effective rebuttals is little different from debating with someone who only thinks he's making effective rebuttals.
When both sides accuse the other of not comprehending the arguments, then what? Naturally, moderators who understand the topic can step in, but the side deemed to be uncomprehending will naturally claim bias.
As long as the participants in this thread find the current situation acceptable (to me, it resembles an impass), I see no need for moderator action, as it would likely cause one side or the other to go off in a huff, thereby ending discussion completely. I encourage both sides to become more imaginative at trying to educate and persuade the other side.
There *is* one improvement I would like to see. I would like to see a cessation of accusations of dishonorable behavior. I *will* step in when I observe it happening, and the consequences will be immediate.
--Percy

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 331 of 739 (120880)
07-01-2004 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 324 by Cold Foreign Object
07-01-2004 3:41 PM


Re: a quick question...
WillowTree writes:
The constant focus on the metric is the actions of the defeated, and proves no matter how much plain evidence is produced the wrath of God sense removal declared in Romans 1 is evidenced to be absolutely true.
Please read Message 322. It would be appreciated if participants could view this discussion as a collaborative effort to establish the facts of the matter, and not as an adversarial melee with winners and losers.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 324 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-01-2004 3:41 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 337 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-01-2004 6:57 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 354 of 739 (121093)
07-02-2004 2:31 AM
Reply to: Message 346 by Cold Foreign Object
07-01-2004 11:30 PM


Re: a quick question...
Admin in Message 322 writes:
It would be appreciated if participants could view this discussion as a collaborative effort to establish the facts of the matter, and not as an adversarial melee with winners and losers.
WillowTree in reply to Jar writes:
You are a chicken-shit liar - straight out.
I'm transferring this topic to [forum=-15], and restricting your posting privileges to that forum.
Other participants, please be aware there is little moderation beyond asking people to stay on topic in [forum=-15]. WillowTree can now do as he likes in this thread.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 346 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-01-2004 11:30 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 357 by wj, posted 07-02-2004 3:01 AM Admin has not replied
 Message 364 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-02-2004 2:46 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 355 of 739 (121094)
07-02-2004 2:32 AM


Thread moved here from the Faith and Belief forum.

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 391 of 739 (121821)
07-04-2004 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 387 by Cold Foreign Object
07-04-2004 1:41 AM


Re: Proposal
My only comment is that there's no need to begin a new thread. The 300 post limit arose because this website used to reside on a server with fewer resources, and threads longer than 300 posts had a tendency to become corrupted because time limits would be exceeded, and because there was a software misimplementation that caused multiple copies of the thread to be read into memory, causing virtual memory exceeded errors for long threads, or even for threads with many long posts. These restrictions no longer exist.
The 300 post limit survives not just as an artifact of this period, but also because experience shows that threads that reach this limit are no longer productive, and so we continued to enforce the 300 post limit. But I see no need to shut down a productive thread just because it's passed 300 posts.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 387 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-04-2004 1:41 AM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-04-2004 7:00 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7


Message 698 of 739 (129318)
08-01-2004 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 695 by johnfolton
08-01-2004 10:59 AM


Re: Topic!
[forum=-15] is intended as an unmoderated forum, but we do ask that contributors stay on topic.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 695 by johnfolton, posted 08-01-2004 10:59 AM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 700 by johnfolton, posted 08-01-2004 12:30 PM Admin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024