PROOF OF GOD

Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

This is an assertion without any support.

It says that 29 and a bit degrees north is the "longest land parallel". What does that mean exactly? (my interpretation suggests that it is not the longest) and please show the calculations that determine that.It is not clear that the meridian isn't the longest land meridian but it also not perfectly clear that it is. Please show the measurements.

WT has suggested restricting those who post to this thread while we try to keep it on track.He didn't have your name on the list DarkStar. WT may invite you if he wishes but until then don't post here. Especially time wasting posts like that one. If you do you will lose your FFA priviledges as well.

This is the special one at WT's request. I don't think there are any others. Thanks for asking. It is noted.This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 07-04-2004 10:59 PM

Yup, it will help stop the jumping on and he has been very generous in the number invited. It is just for this case to see if we can sort something out. Anything I say can be overridden if other admins don't like it. It's not a big deal is it? You may start any number of parallel topics and do so in a forum that WT doesn't even have access to.

This is not the topic that is currently being discussed.

Do not start down the path talking about ancient civilizations. Stick to this topic!If you want to talk about evidence for what "cycles" there have been open another topic.

Free for all or not, you will not be posting if you think you can ignore reasonable requests. Thank you for your consideration. Even here topic is a useful thing to allow us to manage to reach some conclusion.

The topic under discussion is given in post 400. Is there any evidence that there is anything special about the GP at all?If you have something to contribute to that then please do so.

The topic is:The great pyramid as "proof of God".WT has made very specific claims about the physical nature and position of the GP. They are simply summarized in post 400 not changed. WT has agreed with this. Unless those claims are both true and in some way mysterious the GP isn't proof of anything.If you agree with WT then you may contribute to the topic by supporting those claims with some actual evidence that we can all scrutinize. If you can't do that your ramblings will not be welcome.It is a matter of being somewhat well mannered instead of disruptive.