Phatboy writes:
Anything that falls outside of rationality can be assumed to be false until "proven" otherwise.
The problem with this approach is that it limits belief to human wisdom.
I wonder if there are not two different problems in that statement. First, is the former statement correct or should it be "Anything that falls outside of rationality can be assumed to be unknown until "proven" otherwise."
The later statement is also not true. While many of us will say that we can only know things that can be supported by evidence which can be independantly verified, that does not limit what we might believe to be true.
Atheists do not say it's impossible for there to be a GOD, only that there is no independantly verifiable evidence that there is a GOD.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion