riVeRraT, hello and how are you? I noticed that you have made the last five posts in a row....are you having a conversation with yourself? Lets get back on topic, here.
Here is the OP:
Ohnhai writes:
I was musing about the notion that some people might be holding on to a set of inherited and quite thoroughly discredited ideas in their belief paradigm-- not because of any remaining real conviction in those ideas but because of a subconscious fear of the social ramifications of denouncing the ideas taught to them by their family, peers and social group. And, perhaps, also a fear of up-setting God.
To me it seems, there is also a fear of admitting that the implications of science diminish our place in the universe--as if there was something to be ashamed of in admitting our place as wondrous example of the amazing diversity and scope of the marvel that is life!
In science there no shame in getting something wrong. It can be initially embarrassing but acceptable so long as you don’t dig in and throw a tantrum when all your peers show you all the evidence that highlights why you are wrong.
In regard to Religion on the other hand, I have read of many cases where people have left their church and they have become the social stigma of their community. In more extreme cases these people have been hounded, tormented, and even killed for even questioning the teachings and beliefs in light of new discoveries and facts.
Peer pressure is a powerful thing. Peer punishment is truly something to be feared. In religion, especially, there is clearly a well of shame and embarrassment, and not least, fear for some to accept that the wonder that us humans are having been part of the process and not a special specific creation.
Lets refocus on answering Ohnhai and not fussing with each other like siblings!