Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bible: Word of God or Not
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 117 of 301 (360553)
11-01-2006 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by mjfloresta
11-01-2006 12:07 PM


Re: Conviction of Truth is not Proof of Fact
Hi, mjfloresta. I agree that it is very important to insist on fine distinctions.
First you write:
I'll restate the difference between these scenarios: The first muslims believed that Mohammed ascended into heaven. They did not know it for a fact, nor did they die in defense of what they knew.
Then you write:
I'm not that familiar with the Koran so someone will have to help me. Mohammed is claimed to have ascended into heaven. If he did, were there eyewitnesses? (according to the Koran). If there were eyewitnesses, it means nothing that they claimed that Mohammed ascended.
That seems odd: the position that allowed the apostles to know a fact does not allow the followers of Mohammed to know an equivalent fact. Also, you are eager to state facts that a few sentences later you admit are not in your possession.
See how slippery facts are?
Moving on:
The apostles weren't in this situation. They did not believe that Jesus rose from the dead (i.e take it on faith). They KNEW either that Jesus did indeed rise from the dead or that he did not in fact rise from the dead.
Or he wasn't dead to begin with...
Did you know that American colonists in the 18th and early 19th centuries sometimes were buried with bells above their graves, the bell rope trailing down into the casket? You see, they had seen from exhumed caskets--floods, investigations, ghouls, whatever--that some people were apparently buried alive. They developed quite a horror of this possibility. Poe exploited that horror in his story, The Premature Burial.
So I'd say the apostles had no way to know for a fact that someone was dead until that putative corpse began to swell and rot. There are medical conditions that so lower the metabolic rate that only the most subtle of examiners or instruments can detect life. Several times a year we are treated to tales of folks waking up in the morgue.
But if these eyewitness are all willing to die because they know Mohammed ascended...then you're onto something.
Yes. Onto another delusional road that leads people over the cliffs to death like mad sheep.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by mjfloresta, posted 11-01-2006 12:07 PM mjfloresta has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by iano, posted 11-01-2006 6:37 PM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 121 by mjfloresta, posted 11-02-2006 12:36 AM Omnivorous has replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 119 of 301 (360559)
11-01-2006 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by iano
11-01-2006 6:37 PM


Re: Conviction of Truth is not Proof of Fact
Thankee, sirrah.
I'm not dead yet either.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by iano, posted 11-01-2006 6:37 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by iano, posted 11-01-2006 8:19 PM Omnivorous has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 124 of 301 (360752)
11-02-2006 10:33 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by mjfloresta
11-02-2006 12:36 AM


Re: Conviction of Truth is not Proof of Fact
It would not seem odd to you if you had included the rest of what I said in your quote. I clearly differentiated the apostles account from the follower of Mohammed's account.
I read your entire post several times; quoting it entire would have made it seem no less odd.
As to your numbered points: you are asserting the recorded beliefs of others as matters of fact to support a belief you claim to be fact.
No matter how many boards you nail together, scaffolds are not foundations.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by mjfloresta, posted 11-02-2006 12:36 AM mjfloresta has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 125 of 301 (360760)
11-02-2006 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by mjfloresta
11-02-2006 9:11 AM


Re: Conviction of Truth is not Proof of Fact
Anyone can make religious claims, they're cheap. But when someone (many someones) dies for what he either knows to be true or knows to be untrue, their claim has to be evaluated in a much more credible light. You may be able to find one person willing to die for a lie. to die for a lie.
Belief is cheap.
Millions have died because they believed a lie. Magical armors against bullets have failed Chinese, Native American, and African believers, among others--all, interestingly, desperately fighting losing battles against invaders. Desperation is one breeding ground of belief.
A willingness to die lends no credence to the prompting belief. People die for foolish reasons and mistaken beliefs every day.
Oceans of blood--heroic, martyred, or foolish blood--do not establish even one drop of fact. It's just blood.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by mjfloresta, posted 11-02-2006 9:11 AM mjfloresta has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by mjfloresta, posted 11-02-2006 1:52 PM Omnivorous has replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 127 of 301 (360901)
11-02-2006 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by mjfloresta
11-02-2006 1:52 PM


Re: Conviction of Truth is not Proof of Fact
mjfloresta writes:
Your own words prove my point:
Millions have died because they believed a lie. Magical armors against bullets have failed Chinese, Native American, and African believers, among others--all, interestingly, desperately fighting losing battles against invaders. Desperation is one breeding ground of belief.
Millions have died because they believed a lie. This is true. This is also the exact opposite of the Apostle's situation. They died either knowing that they were telling the truth or a lie. They did not "believe a lie". If Christ was not resurrected, then I, today, believe a lie. I wasn't there. That's not a possibility for the apostles, any more than you could believe a lie if you told me you had a million bucks and you didn't. You know you're lying. How does one even believe a lie when it's of one's own telling? Talk about oxymoron...
A willingness to die lends no credence to the prompting belief. People die for foolish reasons and mistaken beliefs every day.
I think we've covered this ground sufficiently by now...you're confusing belief with knowledge...
No, you continue to embrace a Christian exceptionalism that mistakes belief for knowledge.
Many innocent men have gone to prison because witnesses swore, in good faith and quite persuasively, that they saw those man commit a crime. Those people were wrong. Eyewitnesses are intensely persuasive; eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable. You may have seen the studies demonstrating this fact. If not, I'll locate references for you.
The apostles believed they saw the risen Christ--perhaps they did. Or perhaps, like Dickens' Scrooge, it was just a bit of bad meat or an intense desire that provided their vision. Their certainty about what they saw is not evidence; even your evidence for their certainty is several times removed from the apostles themselves.
Let me rephrase things for you. Millions have died--or lived--totally convinced of the truth of an error. You can repeat your claim of an epistemic exceptionalism for the apostles an umpteen times, but it is as hollow the umpteenth time as the first.
But then you open up your briefcase, show me the million bucks, and even let me count it to prove that it's all you said it was. Now, you're reputation doesn't matter. You may be honest as 'Abe or the Father of Lies; It doesn't really matter. It's no longer a matter of belief, but of proof.
Mr. Gullible, meet Mr. Inkjet.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by mjfloresta, posted 11-02-2006 1:52 PM mjfloresta has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Legend, posted 11-03-2006 7:46 AM Omnivorous has replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 130 of 301 (361313)
11-03-2006 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Legend
11-03-2006 7:46 AM


Re: Conviction of Truth is not Proof of Fact
Legend writes:
I think mjfloresta's point is that the apostles would have had first-hand knowledge of the events, rather than rely on eyewitness accounts themselves, therefore their death wouldn't have been founded on their belief in other people's words, but rather on their own conviction derived from their experiences.
I understood his point perfectly well. What made you suppose that I had not?
This is a valid point, however it is based on two huge assumptions:
1) that the gospels are the first-hand testimonies of the apostles
2) that the apostles died martyrs' deaths.
His epistemic assumptions, contradictions, and exceptionalism are actually much larger; for example, consider the enormous conradiction between his certainty about the apostles' certainty and his readiness to recognize that his own consequent beliefs could be mistaken. Thus, in a debate of this sort, just who is confusing knowing and believing is acutely germane.
Legend writes:
Therefore, I don't know why either of you keep debating this. It's totally irrelevant; a moot point.
Then I cannot imagine why you felt the need to comment.
My interest in this debate concerns the relationship between knowing and believing, a matter near the heart of "Bible: Word of God or Not."
The matter of martyrdom was a device of mjfloresta's choice to illustrate his view. Having seen a great deal of blood, I find the device totally irrelevant, moot, and morally hazardous. Given the relevance of knowing and belief to this thread, and the fact that mj continues to disagree and to offer new arguments, why wouldn't I continue to reply?
I'm sure he sees it the same way, and rightfully so. After all, we are at a debate forum.

Drinking when we are not thirsty and making love at any time, madam, is all that distinguishes us from the other animals.
-Pierre De Beaumarchais (1732-1799)
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Legend, posted 11-03-2006 7:46 AM Legend has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024