Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,886 Year: 4,143/9,624 Month: 1,014/974 Week: 341/286 Day: 62/40 Hour: 3/4


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Origin of Life ⇒

Abiogenesis

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Abiogenesis
Neutralmind
Member (Idle past 6152 days)
Posts: 183
From: Finland
Joined: 06-08-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 57 of 305 (394676)
04-12-2007 6:13 PM 		Reply to: Message 49 by jar
04-12-2007 9:43 AM

Nonsense Rob. Of course there is evidence for abiogenesis. There was a time when there were no living things on earth. There are now living things on earth. Therefore abiogenesis happened.
So, because we exist it proves abiogenesis correct. But wait a minute. The bible says god created us. We exist, so that proves creation correct.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by jar, posted 04-12-2007 9:43 AM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by jar, posted 04-12-2007 6:24 PM Neutralmind has replied
Neutralmind
Member (Idle past 6152 days)
Posts: 183
From: Finland
Joined: 06-08-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 59 of 305 (394683)
04-12-2007 6:37 PM 		Reply to: Message 58 by jar
04-12-2007 6:24 PM

Re: not quite.
Not at all. Again, simply a false analogy. There is no question that the Biblical Creation stories are not literally true
That aside, I was just trying to find a good analogy to keep in mind that it's always possible that the first living thing was created and didn't have to come to life through abiogenesis.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by jar, posted 04-12-2007 6:24 PM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 04-12-2007 7:06 PM Neutralmind has not replied
Neutralmind
Member (Idle past 6152 days)
Posts: 183
From: Finland
Joined: 06-08-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 63 of 305 (394707)
04-12-2007 8:16 PM 		Reply to: Message 62 by jar
04-12-2007 7:43 PM

Re: not quite.
Let's Continue in this vein on this topic if need be, whenever it is promoted. Let's leave the offtopic as is.
​
Edited by Neutralmind, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by jar, posted 04-12-2007 7:43 PM jar has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024