Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The new teachings of Jesus
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 6 of 106 (325779)
06-24-2006 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Nuggin
06-23-2006 10:21 AM


Nuggin writes:
If someone were to add a new chapter to the Bible, one which had not existed in any previous versions. Would it be accepted by the literalists as true?
Much of what literalists accept as "true" is already add-ons. We have some who take their "orthodox" theology from commentaries rather than the Bible. We even have some who get their theology from Kirk Cameron videos. Most of the literalist "understanding" of the first part of Genesis comes from creationist videos, not the Bible.
Would literalists accept "new" theology from extra-Biblical sources? Of course.
Would they "add" it to the Bible? No.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nuggin, posted 06-23-2006 10:21 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 20 of 106 (327219)
06-28-2006 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by jaywill
06-28-2006 12:15 PM


Re: Redaction and all that
What makes you think there's any difference between a skeptic and a truth seeker?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by jaywill, posted 06-28-2006 12:15 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by ramoss, posted 06-28-2006 9:18 PM ringo has not replied
 Message 27 by jaywill, posted 06-29-2006 9:36 AM ringo has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 40 of 106 (345215)
08-30-2006 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 7:30 PM


ReformedRob writes:
The very fact that you are aware of the different cannons is evidence that nothing is lost.
Non sequitur. There could be lots of stuff that was lost and therefore isn't in any of the canons.
(Note spelling if "canons".)

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 7:30 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 7:58 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 43 of 106 (345226)
08-30-2006 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 7:58 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
If something has been lost or even left out when it shouldnt be, then it should be demonstrated....
Now that's just silly. If a book or a chapter is missing, how can it be demonstrated? Look for evidence of torn-out pages?
You're claiming that absolutely positively nothing has ever gone missing from the Bible. That's like walking into Wal-Mart and saying, "Nothing has ever been stolen from this store."
I'm simply stating the sensible alternative: It is very possible that something has gone missing and you would never know about it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 7:58 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 8:35 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 45 of 106 (345245)
08-30-2006 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 8:35 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
Let's see, we have 66 books written by 40 authors over a period of a little over 1300 years and you cant find any evidence to back your assertion?
Whoa whoa whoa. You're asserting that there are "66 books" and you're complaining about my "assertion"?
I'm asking you: How do you know that there weren't originally 67 books? Or 167 books? If you're going to assert that "the Bible" is 100% complete, then you're the one who has to provide evidence.
Strictly speaking, this topic is about adding to the Bible, so let's do a suppose.
Suppose a shepherd boy is playing in some caves - say near the Dead Sea - and he happens to find a fragment of parchment that says, "The Gospel According to Earl...." How would you decide whether or not to add the Book of Earl to the canon?
How would you know whether or not it had been lost for two thousand years?
Do you think the Roman Catholics would agree with you and add it to their canon? How about the Rumanian Orthodox? How About the Ethiopian Rosicrucian Stevedorians?
In short, how do you know that there are 66 books in "the Bible"? How do you know that not a chapter, not a verse, not a word, not a letter has been lost from any of those books?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 8:35 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 9:29 PM ringo has replied
 Message 47 by jar, posted 08-30-2006 9:33 PM ringo has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 48 of 106 (345259)
08-30-2006 9:49 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 9:29 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
How did we come to have the books in the bible or canon that we do?
A worthy question, but that's not the topic.
The OP question is:
quote:
Would the brand new chapter in the Bible become retroactively literally true?
So, if a "lost" book, chapter, etc. was found, how would you decide if it was authentic?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 9:29 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 9:56 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 50 of 106 (345264)
08-30-2006 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 9:56 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
it's not just a lost chapter but could include a lost book as well.
Well, you've been denying vehemently that anything could be missing.
In my very first post to you in this thread, Message 40, I said:
quote:
There could be lots of stuff that was lost....
If you agree with me now, I'll ride off into the sunset and leave the rest of them to feed on your carcass.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 9:56 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 10:12 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 53 of 106 (345271)
08-30-2006 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 10:12 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
the tests I have mentioned have been applied many times to authenticate the canon and text we have in the Bible today.
So there's no possibility of ever finding any lost fragments, and even if we do, we have your instructions on how to handle them.
I guess the topic is finished then.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 10:12 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 10:36 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 58 of 106 (345282)
08-30-2006 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 10:36 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
There is no credible evidence to suppose otherwise.
On the contrary, there is no credible evidence to suppose that your magic "66 books" are all there is.
Once again, Wal-Mart. You're claiming that everything that was ever in Wal-Mart is still in Wal-Mart. Nothing can ever be added, nothing taken away.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 10:36 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 11:13 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 60 of 106 (345293)
08-30-2006 11:25 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by ReformedRob
08-30-2006 11:13 PM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
I suppose the ongoing 200+ year old debate in the schools of Higher Criticism have no application then and are useless?
Pay attention: There is no one canon.
Whatever application the schools of Higher Criticism may have, they have not settled on one "Bible".

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by ReformedRob, posted 08-30-2006 11:13 PM ReformedRob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by ReformedRob, posted 08-31-2006 12:58 AM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 62 of 106 (345326)
08-31-2006 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by ReformedRob
08-31-2006 12:58 AM


Re: Could be is not an argument
ReformedRob writes:
What I said is obviously an obscure minority view that has not been scrutinized for 1800+ years.
Yes. Thanks for conceding that.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by ReformedRob, posted 08-31-2006 12:58 AM ReformedRob has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024