Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pauls Contradiction?
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 6 of 31 (262684)
11-23-2005 12:02 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by karen
11-22-2005 7:43 PM


Hi Karen,
Welcome to EvC. Not having thought about it in depth I would tend to agree with Purple Dawns analysis that it had to do with the culture of the day. This because (as she has noted) there is a hint from Paul that this is indeed the case. Whilst I don't feel that everything in the NT (or OT for that matter) should be weighted so significantly in the light of the culture, there is a case to be made here.
I think there are many contentious issues in the bible and it is very easy to form falsh doctrine. It would seem to be wise to take in the overall tenet of scripture when deciding what the overall means to say. Jesus heralded the New Covenant. He and his arrival is the most significant thing in the bible. He is a model of behaviour for us to follow. And he had a lot of time for woman and there is no indication that he considered their views of lesser worth than mens views. If scripture (via Paul) appears to be unexplainably sexist, then there is a possibility (although only a possibility) that it has to do with our misunderstanding whats being said

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by karen, posted 11-22-2005 7:43 PM karen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by karen, posted 11-24-2005 5:22 PM iano has not replied
 Message 27 by DeclinetoState, posted 04-08-2006 8:23 PM iano has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 9 of 31 (263097)
11-25-2005 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by purpledawn
11-24-2005 7:58 PM


Karens Bible writes:
Then in 1 Cor.14,34-35, Paul says " As in all the churches of the holy ones, women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak and should be subordinate, as even the law says. But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a women to speak in the church."
Purpledawn writes:
There's a difference between women asking their husbands questions and a woman who is prophesying. Sorta like the women talking in the backrow of the church as opposed to the woman reading the lesson or preaching today.One is disturbance and the other is participation.
There seems to be a number of things contained within Karens passage which need teasing out. What do you reckon on things like "silence" I understand that if men and women were segregated then shouts across the church would be disturbing - but one would imagine that common manners applied in those days and that folk had figured out a a way of meeting in all kinds of circumstances without pandamonium. Why would it suddenly occur in the church. Did it occur in the synagoge? Hardly.
It seem to mention silence - period. Does that mean men could talk quietly amongst themselves and women couldn't. I would have imagined that if men talking among themselves didn't upset the preacher (presuming they did it that way) then the women who were positioned further back would have had an even less effect.
It seems to indicate that the discussing and decision making was for the men and not the women. Men leading and women following? Difficult that...
There is this difficult issue of subordination as the law says. If its the case of rightful behaviour and not works as you hold in the other thread, what does it mean here. The spirit of the law is that a woman is to be subordinate. Like "wives obey your husband"
I don't mean to debate you intensely on it PD, but just curious as to what position you hold - especially given the increased emphasis on equality of the sexes these days.
Then there is the issue of prophesying. This is not the same as speaking - which is the person themselves at work. Prophesying involves the action of the Holy Spirit speaking through the person. This naturally won't be forbidden.
This message has been edited by iano, 25-Nov-2005 07:04 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by purpledawn, posted 11-24-2005 7:58 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by purpledawn, posted 11-25-2005 6:30 PM iano has not replied
 Message 11 by karen, posted 11-29-2005 4:21 PM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 16 of 31 (264408)
11-30-2005 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by karen
11-29-2005 4:21 PM


If you look at some other posts here your might see something like
quoted text
or
quote:
quoted text
If you'd like to do this in order to highlight something someone has said then press the 'peek' button at the end of this message. Another EvC tag will come up on your task bar and if you click it open you can see what I did to generate these highlights.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by karen, posted 11-29-2005 4:21 PM karen has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024