Creationists as Hyperevolutionists?

My belief is the various animals came off Noah's ark and populated the entire Earth. These species evolved/adapted enough to survive in their new environments. That's my opinion. -open to comments.If the Great Flood happened, is it possible that it made the Earth look older than it is?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sarcasm will get you knowwhere
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NosyNed, read the artical on Answers in Genesis for on the flood and species evolution.

Is that what it said, O really? It said horses, zebra, ect. If you are talking about Biblical history like the Flood, you must remember what it said earlier, on the 6th day of Creation. So yes, I would agree in some aspects that (most) Creationists are Hyperevolutionists - that do NOT believe in inter-species evolution. IE - monkeys to humans, bacteria to frog, ect.

Yes, but according to Bible, since that is an event that it describes also implies monkeys to humans as an exception. Genesis 1: the first day

You say God may be the deceiver... I believe man is just trying to get around the fact that God exists. You tell me logically, and based on past behaviors, why God would try to make His creations believe He doesn't exists.

But what 'evidence' do you have that God placed misevidence to deceive you? What misevidence are you talking about?

Tell me where I disrespect the powers of GOD?!?! And no, I am not calling God the deciever, many of the evolutionists on this site still use that flawed or lying design example to try to make there point. Which is allowing that God exists, and if you believe God exists, you got that from the Bible, so you must also believe the rest of the Bible, so you must believe all literal statements made in the Bible.