Hey CreationMan, I'm just a little confused about these two statements you made.
Percy,
Again you are showing increase in info in the genes. I need to see NEW info from another organism that is not related. That can't happen biologically, it's impossible.
AND
Look why is this so hard?
When a gene is duplicated, that technically "increases" the amount of information. And when there is a frameshift mutation, this is "new" information.
BUT...
Never will you ever see a gene that codes for reptile scales, undergo a mutation or mutations (even over time) that changes that reptile scale information to bird feather information. I have seen no demonstration of this.
Does this clarify the point???
You mention that you "need to see NEW info from another organism that is not related." Then you say,"And when there is a frameshift mutation, this is "new" information." Can you see why I might be confused? If frameshift mutation is "new" information then wouldn't that qualify as the NEW info you need to see? I'm sincerely asking.
Thanks