Hey schraf,
...you use value-laden, vaguely condescending comments like the ones above...
I didn't get this feeling at all from what holmes was saying.
How do you know it isn't just a difference in taste (which you say you support) rather than people having "preconceptions" and "hangups"?
I would say that, in this case, they're the same thing.
It's possible to have differences in taste without preconceptions and hangups, but it would mean actually examining and considering the alternatives critically, confronting our own cultural biases, and working through it. It's holmes' assumption that most people don't do that. I think that's a fair assumption.
I mean, I once asked my girlfriend to "work through her biases" with me once (maybe using slightly different words), and all I got was a slap (and not a nice one on the ass, but a harsh one on the head).
I mean, if we didn't have cultural differences, there wouldn't be "preconceptions" or "hangups".
As I tried to motivate above, they're not the same thing, at least on an individual level. I doubt "culture" wouldn't work as a whole without preconceptions and hangups, but, on the individual level, it's not the same. You can participate in a culture and still confront the hangups and preconceptions. If you go live in a foreign country, you're forced to do it. It's hard. It also feels kind of liberating.
Kind of. Mostly, it's just hard
You have every right to believe that your lifestyle and personal philosophy is superior to everyone else's, and that everyone who doesn't share your taste is lacking in maturity or hasn't expanded their consciousness, or whatever, but I really just wish you would admit it.
I think that's really unfairly harsh. I think you're the one reading into the words "preconception" and "hangup" as being negative. I don't think it's necessary to read what holmes wrote in that way at all.
We all have preconceptions and hangups. If you work within them, you get certain results. If you work through them and outside of them, you get other results. Thus are the facts of life. There's no judgement in making the statement. Honestly I think in such cases the judgement is a reflection of the character of the reader.
In a sense, it's like really great art. Well, only in that sense.
What do you think?