"The Exodus Revealed" Video II

This is another appeal to the reader - you are trying to make it sound like you have presented some form of evidence and that we are trying to derail the thread.What SPECIFIC piece of evidence would you like to discuss?

Charles, it really sticks in your throat to be able to even pay a simple compliment to Ron and Lennart, doesn't it?You're such a great guy . . .

For what exactly ?You are not debating in good faith.

I'll share with you the evidence that's going to be on the up-coming 3-part 3-hour Exodus TV show that will be aired later this year!But you will have to wait to see it, just like all of us!

I told you a long time ago that the only person really able to answer your questions is LENNART MOLLER -- so get in touch with him! He did all the tests that you are whinning about seeing the results for --Go track down Moller --HE'S NOT ON THIS FORUM!

JIM SAID: ADMIN POST 182 SAID: I see no evidence of this occuring.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-08-2004 01:57 PMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-08-2004 02:06 PM

Charles, Charles, Charles -- you've already seen the posts of the pictures and the documentation by Lysimachus, etc.You've seen it, we've told you it's evidence, you argue and argue about it -- and now you want it all re-posted so you can RE-argue about it, and then we'll keep arguing and arguing and arguing about it on and on . . . on and on . . . and on and on and on . . .Don't you get it?We're not going to get sucked into your game, because that's all you're really playing here! You don't want honest answers, your heart is set against hearing any honest answers -- because we've already shared the honest answers with you!My suggestion for you is: 1) either get in touch with Moller to ask him your questions, or 2) wait for the 3-part TV show to see if they answer any of your questions.

Jim, since you have basically come right out in post 199 and 200 and said that you are not going to produce any evidence for us to debate, I see no reason to keep this thread open.I will leave it open for one more hour for people to get in a quick summary. Any issues with my closing the thread will be discussed in the suggestions forum and not here. The suggestions forum will discuss the closing issue, not the exodus video.

---

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com
http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

Jim's current tactics work as follows: This is three-fold, first it is suggesting (to the causal reader) that a number of pieces of evidence have been posted - this is a liar. The second is to present me as unreasonable for pointing out that it has not. The third is to sucker the reader into a side-track about the merits of each of us as people. Remember it should always be about the evidence never the person presenting it Ad Hominem I would again refer the reader to ADMIN post 185.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 08-08-2004 02:16 PM

As far as I care you can close the thread.Talking about this stuff with Charles and jar and some of the others here is a complete waste of our time.They've been shown solid evidence, they reject it.They've been told that a scientist who works with people who deal with the Nobel Prizes has done a book and a video and has an up-coming 3-hour TV series in the making -- in other words, he's doing the process of "scientific investigation" EXACTLY LIKE IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DONE --But this means nothing to "smart guys" like Charles and jar jar.So close the thread, if for no other reason that to shut Charles up!Our work will continue and millions of people around the world are going to be seeing it, whether Charles or jar or anybody else likes it!

And I believe you have been told that Moller's place of employment in an unrelated field has nothing to do with what he is doing at Aqaba.You have also been informed that a pop-sci book, video and TV documentary are not science and have nothing to do with an actual scientific investigation.You have been informed that what you have are possibly observations that have lead you to form a hypothesis. Great. NOW comes the questions that everyone has asked you and you refuse to answer.

---

Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com
http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

Diversionary Tactic - meanless in this context Ad-hominem As mentioned above, this has not occured. Appeal to authority Ad-hominem Ad-hominem Appeal to majority/or arguement to future

As I said, it will be a real joy to see this thread close, just to shut up Charles!

ad-hominem

Jim,All Charles is asking is what Wyatt and you should have done in the first place and that is to properly collect and scientifically test and validate the data.You can conjecture all you want. But that and spiritual discernment and supernatural activities don't add up to scientific evidence. You have shown you have no scientific argument. Don't blame the messenger, it's your message that is thread bare.lfen

---

"So remember, when you're feeling very small and insecure,
how amazingly unlikely is your birth,
And pray that there's intelligent life somewhere up in space,
because there's bugger all down here on Earth." Monty Python's Galaxy Song