Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Omniscience, Omnipotence, the Fall & Logical Contradictions.
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 98 of 354 (359234)
10-27-2006 5:40 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by xXGEARXx
10-26-2006 6:54 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
xXGEARXx,
That's about the size of it, yes.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by xXGEARXx, posted 10-26-2006 6:54 PM xXGEARXx has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 102 of 354 (360947)
11-02-2006 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Christian7
11-02-2006 7:03 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano,
What Jar said.
Any failure to understand the simplicity of this argument is the result of ignorant thinking.
All you have done is make the sentence longer. If god forknew the outcome it must have been predestined.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Christian7, posted 11-02-2006 7:03 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Christian7, posted 11-03-2006 4:28 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 104 of 354 (361301)
11-03-2006 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by Christian7
11-03-2006 4:28 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano,
You have not demonstrated any logical connection between forknowledge and predestination.
How can foreknowledge not be predestination? How can something that is absolutely known about the future not be predestined?
What we have here is a case of humans disagreeing on what the laws of logic are.
No, humans agree what the laws of logic are, for quite obvious reasons. What we have is religious nutjobs being unable to accept that not only does the evidence not support you, but neither does logic. Ergo, in your opinion, not only does a requirement for evidence go out of the window, but so does logic, too.
In another thread I am involved in a discussion with another atheist who maintains that religion actually does no harm, or at least not enough that we should be bothered about..
Thank you for so eloquently supporting my position that it actually does.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Christian7, posted 11-03-2006 4:28 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by Christian7, posted 11-03-2006 11:57 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 126 of 354 (361401)
11-04-2006 6:42 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by Christian7
11-03-2006 11:57 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano,
How can forknowledge BE predestination? You haven't demonstrated that anywhere. I don't have to demonstrate a negative. You have to demonstrate a positive.
Forknowledge is predestination because once something is forknown it cannot be any different. It must & will happen.
I'll define predestined as something that must happen. At least that should be non-controversial.
Premise: God is omniscient & knows everything before it happens.
Inference: God's omniscience means that when I am presented with a choice the outcome is known in advance. Given that god knows the outcome in advance it therefore must happen & therefore meets the standard of being predestined.
Conclusion: Ergo, omniscience = predestination of future events.
If god forknew something that later turned out to be different then he never forknew it in the first place meaning he is not omniscient. If he did forknow it it absolutely must & will come to pass. That is predestination.
The syllogism, "It will happen, therefore it will happen, therefore you can't change it." is just as valid as, "God knows in advance what will happen, therefore it will happen." The only part that matters is the last part, "It will happen." and that is where the trouble arises. You assume that because it will happen we can't change it. Well you're absolutlety right, but the only reason why we can't change it is because we don't know what the future holds. If we knew what the future held, and were not able to change it, then I would say we have a problem with the idea of free will.
It's not about what we know, it's about what god knows. If god knows that I am going to choose a striped shirt to put on this morning, then I cannot change that. It is predestined that I will put a striped shirt on.
but the only reason why we can't change it is because we don't know what the future holds.
The only reason we can't change it is because god knows the outcome. Our not knowing what that outcome is, is irrelevant.
You'll find that true and genuine logic, the kind where all the dots are connected, often leads to the conclusion that the Christian God is the only possible God there is. The only reason we don't have access to such logic is because our minds are so finite and we still know so little about the universe.
So I'll find something that I can't find? Is that the sort of logic you mean? Is that what constitutes logic "where all the dots are connected" in your book? Gooooooood grief, Charlie Brown.
This is going to be one of those silly conversations that is only worth continuing for the sake of the lurkers, isn't it?
Mark
Edited by mark24, : No reason given.

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Christian7, posted 11-03-2006 11:57 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Christian7, posted 11-04-2006 2:31 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 141 of 354 (361797)
11-05-2006 6:56 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by Christian7
11-04-2006 2:31 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano,
OK, first, we must define the difference betweeen forknowledge and predestination:
Forknowledge - Knowing in advance what will happen. (No effect produced)
Predistination - Bringing about a future event. (An effect is produced)
Forknowledge does not create an effect, therefore it cannot be predestination.
To say, "God knows in advance what will happen, therefore it will happen, therefore we can't change it" is just as valid as saying, "Whatever will happen will happen, therefore it will happen, therefore we can't change it." We must either accept determinism reguardless of the existance of God, or reject both of these arguments.
You are just trying to define the problem away by making predestination something that must be intentionally designed. It won't work, I'll make the same argument without recourse to predestination.
Premise: God is omniscient & knows everything before it happens.
Inference: God's omniscience means that when I am presented with an apparent choice when only one option actually exists.
Conclusion: No actual options actually being available means free will cannot be exercised. That other options appear to exist is illusory.
Try again.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Christian7, posted 11-04-2006 2:31 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Christian7, posted 11-05-2006 10:59 AM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 155 of 354 (362114)
11-06-2006 8:51 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by Christian7
11-05-2006 10:59 AM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBiblenano,
3. Considering that he COULD have chosen any one of those, even though God knew he would chose the one he did, and he did, that means he has free will.
He couldn't have chosen any, the outcome was known in advance.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Christian7, posted 11-05-2006 10:59 AM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Christian7, posted 11-06-2006 4:21 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 168 of 354 (362206)
11-06-2006 5:53 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by Christian7
11-06-2006 4:21 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBiblenano,
So whether God is inside or outside of time, it is still logically valid to state that God has forknowledge of our choice which are made of free will.
No it isn't. This is why you have to retreat & say god exists out side of time.
I'll leave you at the same point I left iano, being reduced to ad hoc fallacies to explain why god is outside of reason & logic.
As the lone ranger says, "my work here is done".
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Christian7, posted 11-06-2006 4:21 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Christian7, posted 11-06-2006 6:25 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 174 of 354 (362218)
11-06-2006 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by Christian7
11-06-2006 6:25 PM


Re: God: Just or Unjust?
iBibleNano,
Your work is no where near done because you haven't demonstrated that forknowledge and predestination are connected.
Yes I did, see the post where I removed predestination from the syllogism to counter your attempt to define the problem away.
Plus, iano and I have proposed that God is outside of time anyway.
Ad hoc.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Christian7, posted 11-06-2006 6:25 PM Christian7 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Christian7, posted 11-06-2006 7:14 PM mark24 has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 232 of 354 (381933)
02-02-2007 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 231 by Greatest I am
02-02-2007 11:14 AM


Re: The fall
GIA,
God wants us to know the tree, that's why it is there ....
Why punish us for someone else doing God's will, then?
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by Greatest I am, posted 02-02-2007 11:14 AM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Greatest I am, posted 02-02-2007 4:03 PM mark24 has replied
 Message 234 by Greatest I am, posted 02-02-2007 5:00 PM mark24 has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5224 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 235 of 354 (381962)
02-02-2007 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 233 by Greatest I am
02-02-2007 4:03 PM


Re: The fall
GIA,
If your will does not offend civil law and limitations, what punishment?
The fall & everything that went with it.
Mark

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by Greatest I am, posted 02-02-2007 4:03 PM Greatest I am has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by Nighttrain, posted 02-02-2007 7:05 PM mark24 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024