|
Author
|
Topic: Flaws in the Scriptures
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
|
Message 7 of 152 (66836)
11-16-2003 12:26 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by Apostle
11-16-2003 10:59 AM
|
|
In 3 out of 4 Gospels, Jesus is alive during Passover (in fact, the Last Supper is a Passover meal). In John, Jesus is dead before Passover starts.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by Apostle, posted 11-16-2003 10:59 AM | | Apostle has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 73 by Apostle, posted 11-23-2003 11:05 PM | | Zhimbo has not replied |
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
|
|
Message 35 of 152 (67902)
11-20-2003 4:33 AM
|
Reply to: Message 19 by keith63
11-18-2003 3:43 PM
|
|
Re-read Apostle's original post. The premises aren't about what a random group of people would consistently report, they're about what the inerrant word of God would report. The fact that the Gospels are attributed to different writers is irrelevant if you assume, as a premise, that all the Gospels are the inerrant word of God. You have an interesting discussion in mind, but it isn't the discussion Apostle started.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 19 by keith63, posted 11-18-2003 3:43 PM | | keith63 has not replied |
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
If you're allowed to make up stuff, then, yes most Biblical difficulties can be circumvented. But is there a shred of evidence that two different passovers were ever celebrated? [This message has been edited by Zhimbo, 11-20-2003]
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
|
|
Message 83 of 152 (68953)
11-24-2003 11:25 AM
|
Reply to: Message 71 by Apostle
11-23-2003 10:50 PM
|
|
Re: Different Ressurection Accounts
So, whenever any number is mentioned in the Bible, we are to understand that we should always put "or more" after the number? And this is a satisfactory reconciliation for you?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 71 by Apostle, posted 11-23-2003 10:50 PM | | Apostle has not replied |
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
|
|
Message 124 of 152 (71196)
12-05-2003 12:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 117 by Apostle
12-04-2003 11:06 PM
|
|
Re: Copying Errors Does Not Deny Biblical Inerrency
quote:
"Thankfully we can cross reference and see where these copying errors are. The original texts did not have these errors and so the claim stands."
Perhaps I missed it, but I don't think you've established this at all, I believe you've only asserted it. How do we know the original text does not have these errors? [This message has been edited by Zhimbo, 12-05-2003]
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 117 by Apostle, posted 12-04-2003 11:06 PM | | Apostle has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 125 by Apostle, posted 12-17-2003 12:41 AM | | Zhimbo has not replied |
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
|
|
Message 128 of 152 (74014)
12-18-2003 5:50 AM
|
Reply to: Message 127 by Apostle
12-18-2003 12:33 AM
|
|
Re: Copying Errors Does Not Deny Biblical Inerrency
I'm sorry, but I've read and re-read CA's post, and I can't for the life of me figure out what you mean by "criticisms against my character".
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 127 by Apostle, posted 12-18-2003 12:33 AM | | Apostle has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 129 by Apostle, posted 12-19-2003 12:09 AM | | Zhimbo has replied |
|
Zhimbo
Member (Idle past 6041 days) Posts: 571 From: New Hampshire, USA Joined: 07-28-2001
|
|
|
Message 130 of 152 (74198)
12-19-2003 1:15 AM
|
Reply to: Message 129 by Apostle
12-19-2003 12:09 AM
|
|
Well, as far as I can tell, you haven't showed that you know the original texts were correct. We have different books with different figures. I don't mind assuming one is right, but it sure seems like we can't assume both are right in the original texts - how do we know that the two books haven't disagreed from the start? Maybe I'm not getting something.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 129 by Apostle, posted 12-19-2003 12:09 AM | | Apostle has replied |
|
™ Version 4.2