Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Your Most Controversial Opinions!
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 136 of 300 (368124)
12-07-2006 3:37 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by crashfrog
12-07-2006 12:31 AM


Re: on the shady side of the street
crashfrog:
Oh, right. Hey Schraf, that's your problem - it wasn't that you were about to be gang-raped out in the woods, it's that you need to take responsibility for how you were coming on to them and made them entitled to sex, or whatever.
(That's sarcasm, by the way. But it's really amazing how less than 2 minutes after a near-rape story comes out, the male entitlement defenders pop right up.)
Nothing I've said assumes special privileges for one gender over another.
Nothing I've lets any individual off the hook for his or her violent or aggressive actions.
Rather the contrary, on both counts.
If you read my posts and find otherwise, please quote the comment so we can discuss it. Otherwise, kindly refrain from monstrous misrepresentations of my point of view, however righteous you consider the end to be reached by such means.
The discussion is about what people are capable of. Would I assume a man was guilty of rape with no evidence? No. Would I assume he was capable of rape? Why not?
Then we have no argument. Sounds reasonable to me.
But why do you limit your comments to men? I spoke of everyone.
And why limit the discussion to rape? I spoke of all violations.
I would assume the same things of a woman. Not necessarily guilty of a crime, but capable.
Do you agree?
__
Edited by Archer Opterix, : Typo repair.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : HTML.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : Clarity.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 12:31 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 9:17 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 137 of 300 (368125)
12-07-2006 3:39 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by nator
12-06-2006 8:45 PM


Re: on the shady side of the street
Schraf writes:
Just what do you think it is like for a female to grow up and live in America?
That's quite a list. Which part of the US are you from?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by nator, posted 12-06-2006 8:45 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by nator, posted 12-08-2006 5:36 PM RickJB has not replied
 Message 223 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-12-2006 1:10 AM RickJB has replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5020 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 138 of 300 (368126)
12-07-2006 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 135 by crashfrog
12-07-2006 12:31 AM


Re: on the shady side of the street
Crash writes:
Would I assume he was capable of rape? Why not?
Do you assume that you yourself are capable of rape? You possibly do.
So if you were on a first date with a girl, would you therefore advise her to assume that you are capable of rape? I think not.
It's perfectly right for someone to be on their guard against potential danger, but all-out assumption can be a double-edged sword.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 12:31 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 9:20 AM RickJB has replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 139 of 300 (368130)
12-07-2006 6:51 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by nator
12-05-2006 8:57 PM


In response to a poster who says this--
I find the results of this survey disturbing.
schrafinator writes this:
Good.
It's supposed to make you feel disturbed.
I appreciate this disclosure, Schraf, because it helps me understand better your purpose in returning to this subject.
You say you have a goal: a particular response you desire from readers.
Your goal, as stated, is not to make readers think a certain way. You say you intend them to feel a certain way. The conclusion you wish them to draw is an emotional one.
If you don't mind elaborating a little further, a key detail would help to clarify this.
When everyone on the board feels as disturbed as they are supposed to feel, what will that look like?
Will they say a particular thing? Do a particular thing? What will happen?
___
Edited by Archer Opterix, : Brev.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by nator, posted 12-05-2006 8:57 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by nator, posted 12-08-2006 8:59 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 140 of 300 (368164)
12-07-2006 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Archer Opteryx
12-07-2006 3:37 AM


Re: on the shady side of the street
But why do you limit your comments to men? I spoke of everyone.
Because it's more likely, by far; also, as a male, I possess an advantage of physical strength over women and children but not other males, so that's where the greatest degree of danger is.
The odds of being raped by a woman fall down there in "odds of being struck by lightning" territory. The odds of being raped by a man are apparently so great we can count on one in four women being sexually assaulted during her lifetime. I don't see any reasonable argument from that basis that concludes that women are just as likely to be rapists, as you seem to imply.
There's a reason that more than 95% of all violent crimes are committed by men, AO. Why do you suppose that might be?
And why limit the discussion to rape?
Because that's what was the subject of discussion? And I'm not about to let you change the subject to a discussion of male entitlement to sexual access?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Archer Opteryx, posted 12-07-2006 3:37 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Archer Opteryx, posted 12-07-2006 12:55 PM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 141 of 300 (368166)
12-07-2006 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by RickJB
12-07-2006 3:45 AM


Re: on the shady side of the street
So if you were on a first date with a girl, would you therefore advise her to assume that you are capable of rape? I think not.
Only because that comment would be completely misinterpreted. I would hope, however, that her friends had told her exactly that, and I certainly wouldn't take her out for a romantic drive through the woods in my Jeep at 3 in the morning. At least not until we knew each other a little better.
It's perfectly right for someone to be on their guard against potential danger, but all-out assumption can be a double-edged sword.
1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted during her lifetime; most of those who are so assaulted will be assaulted again. You tell me what kinds of assumptions are warranted from that alarming statistic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by RickJB, posted 12-07-2006 3:45 AM RickJB has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by RickJB, posted 12-08-2006 4:11 AM crashfrog has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 142 of 300 (368171)
12-07-2006 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 132 by nator
12-06-2006 8:45 PM


Re: on the shady side of the street
schraf writes:
As a 10 year old, I was surrounded in the woods by the group of boys who I thought were my friends and ordered to undress. They only let me go when I started to cry and yell my head off.
As a naive young teenager I had gotten into some sketchy situations with boys where things were done to me of a sexual nature that I did not invite and that were frightening.
I've had my ass grabbed as I walked through a crowded night club.
I've had men yell all sorts of disgusting things at me from their cars as I walked on the sidewalk, and also street harassment from male pedestrians, men sitting on benches, etc.
I've been stalked, and many of my friends have been at some point, too. One friend's stalker slashed the window screens of her room and attacked her with a knife as she walked to her car. The police didn't take this threat seriously until she was attacked.
I have several woman friends who were molested by male family members.
I've known several women who were raped, one by a stranger and one by a boyfriend.
You know, I could have sworn only gays were capable of molesting and raping other people.
Added by edit.
Anyway, I was going to ask how or where the rape issue came up when I noticed message #88.
Edited by gasby, : No reason given.

Place yourself on the map at http://www.frappr.com/evc
The thread about this map can be found here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by nator, posted 12-06-2006 8:45 PM nator has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 143 of 300 (368224)
12-07-2006 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by crashfrog
12-07-2006 9:17 AM


Re: on the shady side of the street
It is you, Mr Frog, who are changing the subject. I asked you a straightforward question that follows logically from your own stated principle. You have not answered it.
I spoke of all forms of violation by all genders of persons. My remarks were inclusive. The word I used was 'crime.'
You said your standard for men, in the absence of evidence of wrongdoing, was 'not guilty, but capable.'
Is this your standard for all persons, or males only?
___

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 9:17 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 2:02 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 144 of 300 (368229)
12-07-2006 1:48 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by nator
12-06-2006 8:45 PM


Re: on the shady side of the street
I see nothing in Archer's post to warrant such an acrimonious response.
He simply states that shadows lurk in all of us - regardless of position, gender, race, etc. True statement.
The Christians will attribute this to our fallen nature, I think of it as evolutionary heritage. A heritage that can be overcome with our new found intelligence and self-awareness. With time maybe these shadows may disappear or at least fade as their value becomes of less propagation utility.
I once watched a National Geo film on Killer whales. The Killer whales convened once a year along the coast of an island known as a seal breading ground. As the young seals entered the water, the Killer whales waited and feasted. At times, some of the Killer whales would appear to play with the prey before devouring the young pups. Nature at work.
Towards the end of the film and the end of the breading period they filmed one strangling seal pup flailing in the sea, not having got the swimming thing down yet, and you thought - oh no here it goes again.
However, this time a Killer whale actually rescued the pup and “nosed” it back to shore. And I thought - hey that is intelligent thought taking pity on this poor pup. This was not altruism as may be explained by the selfish gene. The whale had no possible gain from doing this. The whale was satiated and overcame its instinctive response. Maybe, the beginnings of empathy were emerging in this intelligent creature. I suppose one could conjecture that this would be one more seal to dine on next year - maybe but it is a long shot and would unlikely benifit this one particular whale.
The point of this is, I believe, with the emergence of self-aware intelligence, life becomes more aware of the “knowledge of good and evil” and can overcome the shadows of its heritage, red in tooth and claw.
Edited by iceage, : speling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by nator, posted 12-06-2006 8:45 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 2:06 PM iceage has not replied
 Message 226 by 2ice_baked_taters, posted 12-12-2006 5:05 AM iceage has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 145 of 300 (368230)
12-07-2006 2:02 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by Archer Opteryx
12-07-2006 12:55 PM


Re: on the shady side of the street
I spoke of all forms of violation by all genders of persons.
Really? That's not what I read.
What I read was you, responding to several stories of male aggression against Schraf (a woman), asserting that "everybody needs to take responsibility for his or her actions." Now, the only "her" in Schraf's story was Schraf herself, so what exactly are you asserting she needs to take responsibility for? Why, exactly, would you respond to someone recounting how they had been victimized in the past with admonitions that they should "take responsibility" unless you felt that they were responsible for what had happened to them?
Is this your standard for all persons, or males only?
My standard for what?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Archer Opteryx, posted 12-07-2006 12:55 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 150 by Archer Opteryx, posted 12-08-2006 2:28 AM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 146 of 300 (368231)
12-07-2006 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by iceage
12-07-2006 1:48 PM


Re: on the shady side of the street
He simply states that shadows lurk in all of us - regardless of position, gender, race, etc. True statement.
But it's a pretty transparent attempt at a smokescreen. Sure, people in general do bad things. What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
The discussion at hand was the fact that more than 50% of male respondents polled asserted that they would rape a woman, potentially violently, if they thought they could get away with it.
AO's delightful speculations on the nature of humanity, while humerous, are completely irrelevant. Of course, irrelevant distractions from the issue are precisely what I've come to expect from the male entitlement crowd the very second that issues of rape become the subject under discussion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by iceage, posted 12-07-2006 1:48 PM iceage has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 147 of 300 (368249)
12-07-2006 4:02 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by nator
12-03-2006 7:08 PM


Re: Here's goes
Forget it.. already answered
Edited by Creavolution, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by nator, posted 12-03-2006 7:08 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 148 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 4:06 PM Heathen has not replied
 Message 149 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-07-2006 4:08 PM Heathen has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 148 of 300 (368252)
12-07-2006 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Heathen
12-07-2006 4:02 PM


Re: Here's goes
wow.. Can I ask what you base that on?
Her message 107 of this thread provides the research that her conclusion is based on.
I know a lot of american men and I don't think there's onw of them i could say that about.
Yeah, but the friends and family of rapists always say that. "There's no way he's capable of that." The problem is that rape is a crime completely normal men appear to be capable of.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Heathen, posted 12-07-2006 4:02 PM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by JustinC, posted 12-08-2006 4:35 AM crashfrog has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 149 of 300 (368253)
12-07-2006 4:08 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Heathen
12-07-2006 4:02 PM


Re: Here's goes
quote:
wow.. Can I ask what you base that on?
I know a lot of american men and I don't think there's onw of them i could say that about.
and why only american?
It strikes me that that's on the same order of generalisation as one of Faith's "all Muslims are terrorists' type statements
Homer J. Simpson writes:
Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14% of people know that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Heathen, posted 12-07-2006 4:02 PM Heathen has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 150 of 300 (368363)
12-08-2006 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 145 by crashfrog
12-07-2006 2:02 PM


Re: on the shady side of the street
Here's that question again, Mr Frog. I will word it as simply as possible so you can understand.
Please pay attention. If need be, secure the assistance of a native English speaker.
Do you believe that women as well as men are capable of crime?
___

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by crashfrog, posted 12-07-2006 2:02 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by crashfrog, posted 12-08-2006 9:17 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024