Was the destruction of the twin towers scientifically possible on 9/11

quote:

---

I think the main problem with this thread is that we aren't talking bout the scientific parts of the argument

---

Then bring up a scientific point.Mention 1, just one, and let us discuss that.You just mention various subjects, and tell us that no one has explained them. And when you get answered, you dont regonize the answer, you just skip on to mention the next subjects.Lets discuss some of the stuff in your latest post.

quote:

---

No one has yet to explain why there is such a time delay when the buildings collapse

---

Time delay.. what do you mean?

quote:

---

No one has explained why the buildings fall at such a high speed when they collapse

---

Simple answer, Becuase thousands of tons are falling down on them.Long answer, you should actually read the NIST reports.Besides, they didnt fall at "near free fall speeds".

quote:

---

No one has explained how the concrete is pulverized to dust.

---

Simple answer, Becuase thousands of tons are falling down on them.

quote:

---

No one has explained why there is molten steel spewing out of the side of the buildings and pools of molten steel which stay hot for months after the collapse

---

Because there were no molten steel. Hot, red, white glowing steel is not molten. Its hot. Ever seen a blacksmith at work?Cite your sources, where can we find any thing on this molten steel? Pictures, videos, analysis by a scientist. [quote]No one has explained the intense seismic occurrence that happened 15 seconds right before the building collapsed.[quote] Never heard this before. Again, cite your sources.
I doubt that it happened, but even if it did, there would be plenty of proper explenations. Among other things, buildings were starting to crumble.How would this, infact, how would ANY of your arguments prove an "inside job" or that it was a demolition?In one of your posts, you ask for evidence, but you do not ask for scientific analysis or any way of evidence.. you ask for VIDEOS... damn videos. What do you want? A video with creepy music showing random pictures of WTC and MS Paint drawings and some guy with a creepy voice telling you what happened without ever bringing proper evidence into the discussion?

Hmm, then i probably should have read the whole thread, instead of just the last page before answering.I were at work and had a quick look at EvC and couldnt resist answering.I just read the whole thread through and i see all the topics he brought up are extensivly answered and need no further discussion.So just forget most of my post.Btw, theres no capital letters in my name.