Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Just What is (and what is wrong with) Political Correctness?
mick
Member (Idle past 5016 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 23 of 302 (342039)
08-21-2006 4:08 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by docpotato
08-21-2006 12:15 PM


I disagree with RobinRohan's description of the history of PC as a concept originating as a joke amongst liberals. My view is that it arose as a way of attacking liberal concerns with the political uses of language.
In the last two decades of the twentieth century, liberal scholars and journalists who had read a little postmodernist philosphy came to appreciate the importance of language in defining social categories and in defining arbitrary social groups.
For example, science told us that races did not exist, so pscyhologists were forced to ask why people were racist. The answer was that competing groups formed bad opinions of their oponents that were conceptualized in linguistic terms such as "Paki", "Nigger", "Towelhead", etc. Although these ways of describing social groups were without any social of biological meaning (all "pakis" are not the same, all "towelheads" are not the same, and these groups cannot be considered in any way homogenous) they called upon pre-existing prejudices (i.e. all jews are greedy, all blacks are criminals, etc).
Mainstream liberals made a conscious effort to avoid using linguistic categorizations that called upon negative prejudices in a hope that a transformation of language would result in a transformation of perception. That if we don't call people "Pakis" or "Niggers" we won't think of them being a homogenous group, and won't think of them as being homogenously stupid, criminal, lazy, or whatever. By removing or changing the labels to more accurately represent social and biological reality, we would remove some of the political stigma associated with preceived membership of such groups.
The idea of "political correctness" was conceived by right wing leaders in response to this program of progressive (albeit perhaps misguided) linguistic reflection. It had the benefit of harking back to Orwellian views of the official manipulation of language, and gave their right wing constituents the opportunity to continue the non-reflective categorization of ethnic and sexual minorities as homogenous masses to be shunned, while maintaining a sense of moral superiority in "telling things how they are".
The sad thing is that progressive elements of society bought into the right wing view of "political correctness" and made a show of being strictly self-righteous in their application of the concept. For example, at a local primary school, a teacher banned the song "baah baah black sheep" because she thought that the use of the word "black" was racist. If the black sheep had gone on to rob a 7-11 that might have been valid, but otherwise it just goes to show that well-meaning liberals are just as stupid as conservatives.
Nevertheless, the basic idea of examining our use of linguistic categories, especially when these categories are associated with pre-existing prejudices against the labelled group, is sound.
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 12:15 PM docpotato has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:13 PM mick has replied

mick
Member (Idle past 5016 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 102 of 302 (342239)
08-22-2006 3:07 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 4:13 PM


I stand corrected!
Cheers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:13 PM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024