Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Just What is (and what is wrong with) Political Correctness?
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 8 of 302 (342006)
08-21-2006 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 2:36 PM


He says at one point, "stamping out prejudice really means forcing everyone to share the same prejudice, namely that of whoever is in authority."
EXACTLY! It's just another kind of conformism enforced by power, or among us plebes, by huffy ridicule, tones of indignant opprobrium etc. Lockstep mindless marching to the PC drummer is the objective, not true freedom from prejudice if even that were possible, and it isn't.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 2:36 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Dan Carroll, posted 08-21-2006 3:12 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 14 by Heathen, posted 08-21-2006 3:32 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 18 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 3:45 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 9 of 302 (342009)
08-21-2006 3:08 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 2:07 PM


My problem with it is that it seems to try to dictate feelings. We are supposed to go around feeling nice, politically correct feelings all the time. But people aren't that way. Thus they sometimes PRETEND to have such feelings. That's why I call it a pretense.
Yes. DICTATES. The Thought Police as it has also been called.
It encourages the opposite of freedom of thought, it encourages anxiety about having the right feelings, which is a level about which nobody should ever have to have anxiety, unless as a Christian you refer all your thoughts and feelings to God and ask Him to change them. Not your fellow man.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 2:07 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Heathen, posted 08-21-2006 4:18 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 20 of 302 (342030)
08-21-2006 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by nator
08-21-2006 3:45 PM


Homo Sapiens.
We are not discussing ethnicity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 3:45 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 4:28 PM Faith has replied
 Message 35 by kuresu, posted 08-21-2006 4:35 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 44 of 302 (342072)
08-21-2006 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by nator
08-21-2006 4:28 PM


You always seem to be having some conversation with yourself that doesn't relate to anything I'm talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 4:28 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 4:52 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 52 of 302 (342092)
08-21-2006 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nator
08-21-2006 4:52 PM


Is it or is it not "PC" to frown on the use of certain terms for ethnic groups?
I find it rather pathetically parochial myself, nothing to get all het up about, maybe about as small-minded and unmannerly as getting in a moralistic meltdown about it, or maybe not quite that bad.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 4:52 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 8:06 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 69 of 302 (342142)
08-21-2006 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by nator
08-21-2006 8:06 PM


duplicate
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 8:06 PM nator has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 70 of 302 (342144)
08-21-2006 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by nator
08-21-2006 8:06 PM


OK, so you agree that calling somebody of Italian decent a "dego Mafia wop" is small-minded and unmannerly, correct?
Of course.
I also think that what you are doing is smallminded and unmannerly.
And off topic. If you were following the discussion you'd understand that PC is not about such things.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 8:06 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 8:22 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 72 by Omnivorous, posted 08-21-2006 8:24 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 81 of 302 (342164)
08-21-2006 9:11 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Omnivorous
08-21-2006 8:24 PM


Actually, PC was a term coined by the right to describe liberal attempts to discourage hate speech that used terms such as nigger, wop, and kite.
The Marxist revisionism is your personal fantasy.
Only according to liberals who have a vested interest in not understanding it.
It was driving me crazy in the 60s already, long before I had a name for it, and it wasn't about nigger, wop and kiKe. It was an aggressive hate war on the white race as the cancer of the world, on conservatives, who we all know are nothing but a bunch of Hitlers and jingoistic idiots; on America, which is really only an evil imperialist monster. Those who agree with such sentiments of course object to conservatives daring to characterize them as Thought Control or anything pejorative. It was militant in-your-face black activism, in some cases out and out thuggery (it was a murder that woke up David Horowitz). It was militant feminism, one group cheerily named The Society for Cutting Up Men, characterized by sneering contempt for any demented woman who liked the idea of marriage and family as a career, or horror of horrors identified herself as a "housewife." It was militant gay rights. I remember attending a "talk" with my ex in which the speaker got up and berated the assembled group for any thought that homosexuality might be an aberration, and accused all assembled of REALLY being homosexual but denying it. It was an abusive speech.
Intimidation.
That's PC. It's the abusiveness, the labeling, the smearing, the aggressive rejection of any other opinion, the enforced prohibition against thinking anything other than what they say you should think.
It was such a relief finally to have a name for it, which I didn't have until the 90s, to read David Horowitz and others and find out where all that insanity came from.
{edit: This is the classic conservative statement on PC, but it's frustrating because I don't know much about the context of it, or much about Bill Lind, and although he says the term originated in a comic strip he doesn't name the strip and I can't find another reference to it anywhere.}
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Omnivorous, posted 08-21-2006 8:24 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by Dan Carroll, posted 08-21-2006 10:08 PM Faith has replied
 Message 95 by Jaderis, posted 08-21-2006 11:52 PM Faith has replied
 Message 97 by Omnivorous, posted 08-22-2006 12:28 AM Faith has replied
 Message 271 by Modulous, posted 08-23-2006 7:09 AM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 82 of 302 (342165)
08-21-2006 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by nator
08-21-2006 8:52 PM


Robin, do you feel oppressed to the de-gendering of words, like using "chair" or "chairperson" instead of "chairman", "mail carrier" instead of "mail man", "police officer" instead of "police man", or "flight attendant" instead of "stewardess"?
I do. I consider it idiotic and tyrannical and in many cases bad English, which comes up in the endless stumbling over the generic "his" and the requirement to substitute "their." Which I do to avoid endless nagging.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 8:52 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 9:36 PM Faith has replied
 Message 91 by nator, posted 08-21-2006 10:48 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 98 of 302 (342215)
08-22-2006 12:42 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Jaderis
08-21-2006 11:52 PM


Perfect PC. Read David Horowitz. He helped engineer it all.
Sorry I forgot the context of SCUM. It was the tone of the era. And there were lots of "feminist" groups in those days with bizarre ideologies, one group that had "consciousness-raising" meetings reading Mao's Little Red Book, dressed in overalls and heavy boots.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Jaderis, posted 08-21-2006 11:52 PM Jaderis has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by Jaderis, posted 08-22-2006 2:14 AM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 99 of 302 (342217)
08-22-2006 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by Omnivorous
08-22-2006 12:28 AM


Funny how violently the left has to tear down one of their own who sees the light.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Omnivorous, posted 08-22-2006 12:28 AM Omnivorous has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 101 of 302 (342238)
08-22-2006 3:01 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Jaderis
08-22-2006 2:14 AM


You've just bought the propaganda. The Black Panthers were nothing but thugs and murderers merely exploiting the Civil Rights movement. Sociopaths, period. Horowitz was intimately involved with them at the time, until he saw through them.
This has nothing to do with the legitimate claims of the civil rights movement. And no, I wouldn't have reacted violently. Plenty didn't, as you acknowledge. I will not rationalize the violence as the left does and you are now doing. In the liberal San Francisco Bay Area yet, not even the South where they could maybe have made some degree of a righteous case for their criminal activity. There wasn't a shred of a righteous motive in their minds, it was all Hate Whitey and trash everything, and the Marxists were pushing them to it because of their own agenda, which is simply to bring down the West. You know, The Revolution.
Horowitz was in the business of manufacturing the leftist propaganda that was driving me crazy at the time. Nothing made up about this, the leftist rhetoric was thick and inescapable. It took Horowitz a long time to change his views and he still has one foot in the left by some standards. No intellectual whore at all. A very honest guy who saw the light.
And don't tell me I'm "unbelievable." That's rude.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Jaderis, posted 08-22-2006 2:14 AM Jaderis has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by nator, posted 08-22-2006 8:05 AM Faith has not replied
 Message 220 by Omnivorous, posted 08-22-2006 9:11 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 103 of 302 (342247)
08-22-2006 3:44 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by docpotato
08-21-2006 9:36 PM


English needs a gender-neutral singular pronoun for hypotheticals.
We were all trying to think one up in the days. All the inventions were just weirdly artificial.
The fact is that the masculine IS gender-neutral. I always read it as neutral until feminism came along and complained about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 9:36 PM docpotato has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by nator, posted 08-22-2006 8:04 AM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 104 of 302 (342248)
08-22-2006 3:47 AM
Reply to: Message 86 by MangyTiger
08-21-2006 9:45 PM


Thanks for the information about the -man ending. That's how I always read it but I didn't know there was a grammatical defense for it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by MangyTiger, posted 08-21-2006 9:45 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 105 of 302 (342251)
08-22-2006 3:51 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by RAZD
08-21-2006 9:47 PM


Re: mr manners (oops)
PC is really not about politeness or any legitimate political grievances. Those may provide a starting point or an excuse, but PC itself is an aggressive assault on thought and feeling, a hate package of incredible virulence against Designated Enemies who are just ordinary human beings.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by RAZD, posted 08-21-2006 9:47 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by RAZD, posted 08-22-2006 8:08 AM Faith has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024