Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Just What is (and what is wrong with) Political Correctness?
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 302 (342011)
08-21-2006 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Faith
08-21-2006 3:03 PM


EXACTLY! It's just another kind of conformism enforced by power, or among us plebes, by huffy ridicule, tones of indignant opprobrium etc. Lockstep mindless marching to the PC drummer is the objective, not true freedom from prejudice if even that were possible, and it isn't.
Last I checked, the objective of PC was that people not be dicks. If anyone really feels the need to stand up and proclaim that they will not be forced to march lockstep with semi-decent behavior, that's their prerogative, I suppose.
Of course, the righteous indignation here is kind of undermined by the fact that anyone who wants to still has the right to call a black guy a nigger, or call gay guys faggots, or what-have-you. And, of course, everyone else has the right to respond by saying, "Geez, what a dick."
Since the latter part of this equation is, as far as I know, the absolute limits of the power PC has over society, I'm not really sure where all this business about those in power enforcing their conformism comes from.
Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 3:03 PM Faith has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 302 (342029)
08-21-2006 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 3:42 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
They are simple-minded. We are exclusive, we make assumptions, we judge people, we stereotype.
We also wipe our noses on our sleeves. But the grownups in the room know that, although their impulse is to get the booger out of their nose right now, it would probably be best to go find a tissue.
But there are, of course, always those social misfits who just hock up their snot anywhere they please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 3:42 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:04 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 302 (342041)
08-21-2006 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 4:04 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
My point is that it's impossible to live without judging and assuming and so forth.
What you can do, however, is pay attention to your responses, and understand when your actions are offensive.
It's impossible to live without taking a crap. It's possible, and advisable, to not crap your pants in public.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:04 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 4:20 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 302 (342051)
08-21-2006 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by docpotato
08-21-2006 4:20 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
It's all in the clench.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by docpotato, posted 08-21-2006 4:20 PM docpotato has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 88 of 302 (342174)
08-21-2006 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Faith
08-21-2006 9:11 PM


That's PC. It's the abusiveness, the labeling, the smearing, the aggressive rejection of any other opinion, the enforced prohibition against thinking anything other than what they say you should think.
I'm still curious as to who is actually enforcing this enforced prohibition.
You've certainly done a good job of pointing out how American white people were the ones who really had it rough in the sixties, but you have yet to tell us who has actually managed to prohibit you from thinking something other than that what they said you should think.
So far, it just seems like people have decided they don't like you because of what you think, and told you so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 9:11 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by crashfrog, posted 08-21-2006 10:30 PM Dan Carroll has not replied
 Message 106 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 3:52 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 134 of 302 (342323)
08-22-2006 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by Faith
08-22-2006 3:52 AM


to answer your insinuation that I was being criticized and didn't like it, what I was criticized for was being "too analytical," not for my political views. I wasn't a conservative or a Christian at the time, even thought I was a liberal, although really I was mostly a-political, and I hated the whole political scene because of the leftist atmosphere which I really didn't understand at all. It was an atmosphere of ugliness, of intimidation, of hostility, of vague constant threat, of irrationality, of the trashing of culture and intellectual ideals by vulgar violent activism. I hated it with a passion but I didn't have a name for it until much much later.
You said all this already. But I'm not asking who was mean to you. I'm asking who enforced the "enforced prohibition" against thinking anything other than what they want you to think.
To my knowledge, you still have the right and ability to think whatever you please. If someone is trying to forcibly prohibit you from doing so, they're doing a really shitty job.
What specific measures have they taken to keep you from thinking a certain way?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 3:52 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 10:05 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 143 of 302 (342338)
08-22-2006 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by Faith
08-22-2006 10:05 AM


My you have a strange inability to grasp the point here. I'm talking about the general effect of social opprobrium, peer pressure, the lack of exposure to different points of view -- so often the case in universities today too.
Oh. So you are talking about people not liking you, and saying so. You just feel pressured because so many people don't like you.
I just figured that when you said "enforced prohibition," you meant... y'know. That someone was actually prohibiting something by force.
It's not too far from the situation in Communist countries where nobody could say anything against the establishment
Except that, apparently, you get internet access in the gulag.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 10:05 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 146 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 10:27 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 150 of 302 (342346)
08-22-2006 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 146 by Faith
08-22-2006 10:27 AM


Typical puerile nonsense. Sorry I bothered.
And for my part, I will note for future reference that if "social opprobrium" and "peer pressure" are levied against you, it does not mean that people don't like you, it is in fact "enforced prohibition." But if there is a case of "enforced prohibition", it does not mean that something is being prohibited by force.
See, I'm learning.
Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 10:27 AM Faith has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 166 of 302 (342381)
08-22-2006 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by robinrohan
08-22-2006 12:21 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
One is urged by this moral system to be public-spirited.
No... you got urged by this forum to be public-spirited, and decided it was because of political correctness.
Not to be so is wicked by PC standards and is called "apathy."
I think you get called apathetic because you "reserve [your] basic right not to give a damn." That's what apathy means... not giving a damn.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 12:21 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 1:10 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 169 of 302 (342384)
08-22-2006 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by Faith
08-22-2006 12:34 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
It's conformism in thought and feeling demanded and enforced by extreme moralistic denunciations.
In all seriousness, Faith... I still don't get how this is not "people don't like you, and say so," if the only means by which it is enforced is "extreme moralistic denunciations."
There's no force of authority. No physical force. Just people reacting to what others say and do by saying they think poorly of the person (denouncing them) for what they say and do. Even if it is extreme, it's still just variations on responding to someone's attitude by saying, "Geez, what a dick."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 12:34 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 12:46 PM Dan Carroll has replied
 Message 175 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 12:53 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 174 of 302 (342390)
08-22-2006 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by Faith
08-22-2006 12:46 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
You are personalizing something that is not personal, and missing the whole point.
If it will make you feel better, feel free to read the question as:
quote:
I still don't get how this is not "people don't like someone, and say so," if the only means by which it is enforced is "extreme moralistic denunciations."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 12:46 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 12:55 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 302 (342395)
08-22-2006 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by robinrohan
08-22-2006 12:53 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
I think the reference is to social pressures in the real world.
Read the rest of the question, Robin. I'm asking, if the only force behind it is social pressure, then it doesn't it basically amount to "people don't like someone?" (Or, in extremes, lots of people don't like someone."
Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 12:53 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 1:08 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 178 of 302 (342397)
08-22-2006 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Faith
08-22-2006 12:55 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
It's a system of thought, it's not just saying you disagree with something or dislike someone.
Okay. Let's assume it's a system of thought by which people don't like someone because of their attitude and actions.
All this means is that a person's system of thought will lead them to respond to someone by saying, "Geez, what a dick."
Edited by Dan Carroll, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Faith, posted 08-22-2006 12:55 PM Faith has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 180 of 302 (342400)
08-22-2006 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by robinrohan
08-22-2006 1:08 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
Yes, but such pressures are powerful. One must conform or be out on the streets.
Which, of course, makes one wonder how you and Faith are managing to get internet access from your cardboard box behind the 7-11.
Do you feel that people have a right to be liked?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 1:08 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 1:21 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 302 (342402)
08-22-2006 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by robinrohan
08-22-2006 1:10 PM


Re: It is not PC to be PC
Yes, you've made that clear. But so far, the only connection you've established is you calling it PC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 1:10 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 1:44 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024