Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Just What is (and what is wrong with) Political Correctness?
Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 5 of 302 (341979)
08-21-2006 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 2:07 PM


robinrohan writes:
We are supposed to go around feeling nice, politically correct feelings all the time
I really don't think PC-ness expects or commands you to feel a certain way, but rather requires that you perhaps express those feelings with a little thought for who will be affected.
For me a lot of it is referring to people in such a way as to be descriptive without being derogatory.
When we get into the realms of phrases like 'vertically challenged' as opposed to 'short' I agree, it becomes utterly ridiculous,
however I think situations such as that are merely a right wing characature of political correctness and not any real, living value system.
Edited by Creavolution, : spelling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 2:07 PM robinrohan has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 14 of 302 (342020)
08-21-2006 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Faith
08-21-2006 3:03 PM


faith writes:
huffy ridicule, tones of indignant opprobrium etc. Lockstep mindless marching to the PC drummer is the objective,
I think you are mistaken here. This seems to be your projection of your feelings toward the PC person. You feel that they are inhibiting your right to think a certain way. this is not true. this is exactly the Characature of PC i was talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 3:03 PM Faith has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 15 of 302 (342024)
08-21-2006 3:37 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 3:21 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
My changes in bold
1. Be inclusive, not exclusive.
2. don't make assumptions about people
3. Don't pity...I'd like to remove this one, I don't think it has anything to do with PC
4. don't judge people
5. recognize that modern society still is quite a racist society
6. recognize that modern society is still sexist in many ways
7. don't stereotype people.
8. have "self-esteem"
I fail to see what is wrong with these sentiments.
Edited by Creavolution, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 3:21 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 3:42 PM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 21 of 302 (342037)
08-21-2006 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 3:42 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
robinrohan writes:
We are exclusive, we make assumptions, we judge people, we stereotype
true.. What are the good effects of ths though?
do you think we should try not to be exclusive? try not to make assumtions (at least incorrect ones), try not to stereotype?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 3:42 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:18 PM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 27 of 302 (342046)
08-21-2006 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
08-21-2006 3:08 PM


faith writes:
Yes. DICTATES. The Thought Police as it has also been called.
It encourages the opposite of freedom of thought, it encourages anxiety about having the right feelings, which is a level about which nobody should ever have to have anxiety, unless as a Christian you refer all your thoughts and feelings to God and ask Him to change them. Not your fellow man.
So your perception of PC does all the things that Christianity does, but because it's not sanctioned by god (supposedly) the same principles are suddenly wrong.
this should give you some insight into why a lot of people resent christianity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 08-21-2006 3:08 PM Faith has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 32 of 302 (342054)
08-21-2006 4:28 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 4:18 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
robinrohan writes:
No, I prefer being exclusive myself. I want to associate only with the best and brightest.
No one is saying who you should choose to associate with. that has nothing to do with PC. I don't know where you get that idea.
robinrohan writes:
Why is "judging" always viewed in a negative way? There's such a thing as a favorable judgment. I make favorable and unfavorable judgments about people all the time. Everybody does.
Indeed, I agree.
The problem occurs when people make incorrect judgements, or judge on the right criteria. For instance.. Judging that because of a persons sexuality they are suddenly not suitable to look after children. Or judging that because of a person's ethnic background they are somehow less trustworthy or more evil than someone else.
I see no problem with judging each individual on their individual merits, not based upon some Stereotype.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:18 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:38 PM Heathen has not replied
 Message 63 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 6:57 PM Heathen has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 47 of 302 (342082)
08-21-2006 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 4:51 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
robinrohan writes:
Let's say I meet some man at a party and he strikes me as rather rude. As time passes, I find out that he's not so rude after all. I classified him initially as "rude."
To say we must not stereotype is very misleading.
that's not stereotyping though.
If the man you met was rude and was wearing an eyepatch, and you then went on to assume every man wearing an eyepatch was rude before even meeting them, that would be stereotyping.
You would be making a judgement on that person based upon the fact they wore an eyepatch.
That would be wrong don't you think?
Edited by Creavolution, : No reason given.
Edited by Creavolution, : spelling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 4:51 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 5:05 PM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 50 of 302 (342088)
08-21-2006 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 5:05 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
robinrohan writes:
I have this category in my head labelled "rude people." I have classified them. We're not supposed to do this, according to PC.
Classifying an individual by their individual characteristics is not stereotyping.
Stereotyping is when you apply that classification to a number of people without actually being sure if they fit that classification

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 5:05 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 5:36 PM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 58 of 302 (342111)
08-21-2006 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 5:36 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
robinrohan writes:
It doesn't have to be a number of people. One person can be stereotyped.
Stereotyped with respect to some preconception?... based upon what?
the number of people is largely irrelevant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 5:36 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 6:10 PM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 60 of 302 (342119)
08-21-2006 6:22 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 6:10 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
robinrohan writes:
You mentioned classifying a "number of people" when we are not "sure," and you said this was wrong.
1 is a number of people, so is 2 ..so is 3... the point remains the same.
I am Irish, so is Iano, is it reasonable to assume that I am evangelical or that Iano is agnostic based upon your experience of either one of us?
No. It's not even remotely intelligent. It's lazy and should be avoided. you can think what the hell you like, but you would be wrong to treat one or other of us based upon your limited experience.
robinrohan writes:
PC makes these sweeping generalizations about how we are supposed to think and even feel about people, and it's not realistic. So it ends up being a pretense.
I disagree.. I think PC is more concerned with how you act towards people, not what you think.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 6:10 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 6:37 PM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 62 of 302 (342130)
08-21-2006 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by robinrohan
08-21-2006 6:37 PM


Re: PC rules--just a stab at it
In many cases it becomes a kind of mental engineering in which students are encouraged to see prejudice
If you want people to avoid prejudice, you surely have to make them aware of it?
If you want me to avoid driving into a tree you surely must show me what a tree is, so I can recognise and avoid it.
still I do not see how your quote makes thinking and doing Inseparable.
Edited by Creavolution, : inserted quote for clarity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by robinrohan, posted 08-21-2006 6:37 PM robinrohan has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 152 of 302 (342353)
08-22-2006 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by ikabod
08-22-2006 4:11 AM


ikabod writes:
does changing chairman to chairperson change the male female ratio of chairpoeple ??
No but it will have the effect of changing the preconceoption of that role and a predominantly male role.
ikabod writes:
does calling someone afroamerican change the way they are treated by racists ??
No. but it is a far more respectful way to refer to members of society. or do you think it's ok to call black people 'coon' or 'nigger'?
ikabod writes:
people who use racial / ethnic / gender or what ever hate names and terms need to keep using them so we can clearly see them for what they are ... and we can deal with them ...
But it is very important to take disrespectful and insulting references out of society so our children do not grow up thinking it is ok.
ikabod writes:
papering over the reality with PC terms is no solution ...and this is the danger of PC it hides the truth
PC does not paper over these problems, it makes an effort to remove them from our everyday life.
what is your solution?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by ikabod, posted 08-22-2006 4:11 AM ikabod has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by robinrohan, posted 08-22-2006 11:11 AM Heathen has not replied
 Message 159 by ikabod, posted 08-22-2006 11:43 AM Heathen has replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 194 of 302 (342416)
08-22-2006 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by ikabod
08-22-2006 11:43 AM


ikabod writes:
they are members of the americans society , they are american why indicate their ancestrial origins
Are people not allowed to assert their Identity? if someone wishes to retain some of the ethnic/ansestral identity who are you to deny them?
whether they be of Irish decent, German decent, Chinese.. whatever.
The point is, that retaining this identity should not become a grounds for discrimination. If you question why people should indicate their origins, why stop at 'american society' maybe we should all designate ourselves 'citizens of earth' and refuse to make any reference to our nationality at all?
Your notion of ignoring a persons ancestral origins IS treating the symptom. putting your hands over your ears and shouting "lalalala! I can't see your ethnicity and refuse to accept it."
You cannot pretend that there are no ancestral or cultural differences, you should celebrate the diversity, and ensure it does not become a grounds for discrimination.
trying to sweep these differences under the carpet does nothing to solve the associated problems

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by ikabod, posted 08-22-2006 11:43 AM ikabod has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 266 by ikabod, posted 08-23-2006 3:25 AM Heathen has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 195 of 302 (342417)
08-22-2006 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by Brian
08-22-2006 12:46 PM


Re: PC mad
Y'see that's just crap... nonsense.
That is 'Political correctness gone mad' for sure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Brian, posted 08-22-2006 12:46 PM Brian has not replied

Heathen
Member (Idle past 1313 days)
Posts: 1067
From: Brizzle
Joined: 09-20-2005


Message 204 of 302 (342438)
08-22-2006 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by Brian
08-22-2006 12:46 PM


Re: PC mad
Actually you've put me in mind of an old spitting image sketch (possibly from the 80's)
it was three or four tory wives sitting around drinking tea and talking about politics.
they would mention things like sexual and racial equality and then shriek "It's all political corrcteness gone Maaaaad!"
a satire for sure but indicative of the over enthusiasm for the political right to thrust the label onto anything that might be percieved as 'liberal' or left-of-centre.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Brian, posted 08-22-2006 12:46 PM Brian has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024