Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Landmark gay marriage trial starts today in California
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 149 of 759 (577136)
08-27-2010 9:55 AM
Reply to: Message 148 by Taz
08-27-2010 9:25 AM


Re: I lost respect for latino and black communities
are you equating people who are against the judge's desicion on prop 8 to genocidial dictators? I hope not, cause that would be funny logic on your part.
Well, we'll just ship them back to mexico and they can discriminate their own gheys.
The Mexicans and Mexican Americans have been in California since California WAS part of Mexico. Now if you want to give California back to Mexico, then I may agree with you, but shipping people who have lived in the area for hundreds of years, to a land to the south because the current land was stolen from the nation to the south seems a bit odd, especially after all these years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 148 by Taz, posted 08-27-2010 9:25 AM Taz has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 169 of 759 (577356)
08-28-2010 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 168 by Taz
08-28-2010 12:13 AM


Re: I lost respect for latino and black communities
the black communities and mexican communities jump off a cliff who hits the ground first?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Taz, posted 08-28-2010 12:13 AM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by Taz, posted 08-28-2010 12:16 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 219 of 759 (651562)
02-08-2012 10:31 AM


Oh Joy

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by crashfrog, posted 02-08-2012 10:49 AM Artemis Entreri has replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 222 of 759 (651574)
02-08-2012 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by crashfrog
02-08-2012 10:49 AM


LIBTARD RAGE!!!!!!!!
What the Fuck are you talking about.
I said joy, as in I am HAPPY FOR THEM
you want to talk about trolls, roflmfao. I say something positive and all you can see is red.
sometimes i think you are retarded.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by crashfrog, posted 02-08-2012 10:49 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 223 of 759 (651575)
02-08-2012 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 221 by subbie
02-08-2012 11:09 AM


Gollum is riverfolk, leave it to you to not even know what a troll looks like.
so ignorant

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by subbie, posted 02-08-2012 11:09 AM subbie has seen this message but not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 234 of 759 (652316)
02-13-2012 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 230 by dwise1
02-11-2012 11:13 PM


That's it? Something that has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with "the debate"?
anytime you can slander the right or the republicans, it is ALWAYS on topic and acceptable here @ EvC. you should know that double standard by now.
She's a Republican. She's supposed to oppose same-sex marriage. That's her party-culture's requirement of her, if not her party's. But instead of being a typical party tool, she decided to be a Mensch, a genuine person. She spoke from her heart and her heart told her plainly and clearly that this hatred against love is wrong.
i disagree, I don't think being a republican means you have to be against two people who love each other getting married.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by dwise1, posted 02-11-2012 11:13 PM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 235 by Theodoric, posted 02-13-2012 12:19 PM Artemis Entreri has replied
 Message 236 by subbie, posted 02-13-2012 3:44 PM Artemis Entreri has seen this message but not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 237 of 759 (652427)
02-13-2012 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 235 by Theodoric
02-13-2012 12:19 PM


Re: Slander, libel
LOL when the truth comes out it's time to get into semantics.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by Theodoric, posted 02-13-2012 12:19 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 238 by Theodoric, posted 02-13-2012 5:38 PM Artemis Entreri has replied
 Message 239 by subbie, posted 02-13-2012 5:38 PM Artemis Entreri has seen this message but not replied
 Message 248 by Theodoric, posted 02-14-2012 10:17 AM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 240 of 759 (652448)
02-13-2012 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 238 by Theodoric
02-13-2012 5:38 PM


Re: Still waiting
everywhere in most threads if you can't see it i doubt i can show it too you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 238 by Theodoric, posted 02-13-2012 5:38 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 256 of 759 (652524)
02-14-2012 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 251 by Theodoric
02-14-2012 10:29 AM


Unless we're talking about throwing rice at a gay wedding, I don't see how this is on topic.
You mean like this post above?
Maybe you can find a thread dedicated to "liberal commie" bashing and take it there, m'kay?
Or off topic like this post? Stop wasting space!!!! LOL
Theodoric writes:
Link to original source.
The problem with that data is that it is national. Marriage is a STATE issue, it always has been. What the majority of the population thinks across the country is irrelevant.
Theodoric writes:
Simply a lie. Please show an overwhelming vote against gay marriage.
Seriously?
You can find the legend here: Same-sex marriage in the United States - Wikipedia
Pink - Statute bans same-sex marriage (9 states)
Red - Constitution bans same-sex marriage (8 states)
Dark Red - Constitution bans same-sex marriage and some or all other kinds of same-sex unions (18)
If you really want to I am sure I can look up polls and surveys in those 18 dark red states and find plenty of data where there is an overwhelming vote against gay marriage.
While it is not overwhelming (I like how you used a word that you get to decide what it means), Here in Virginia we became a dark red state: http://www.washingtonpost.com/...11/05/10/AFIy0lhG_blog.html
A: This has to be either a poor attempt at you playing some sort of Devils Advocate or you're trolling. You've always seemed at least somewhat open-minded.
LOL
You just can’t disagree with us and if you do then you are a troll and you are close minded!!!
Does anyone else see the hilarity of the consequences of having a different opinion than hooah?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Theodoric, posted 02-14-2012 10:29 AM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by subbie, posted 02-14-2012 12:24 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 258 of 759 (652536)
02-14-2012 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 257 by subbie
02-14-2012 12:24 PM


Except when it isn't. See Loving vs. Virginia.
Especially when it is.
See: the Defense of Marriage Act.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by subbie, posted 02-14-2012 12:24 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by subbie, posted 02-14-2012 4:08 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 261 of 759 (652647)
02-15-2012 9:52 AM
Reply to: Message 260 by subbie
02-14-2012 4:08 PM


So you mention a federal law, defining how the federal government recognizes marriage, to support your claim that it's a state matter. Curious.
I know its difficult for one such as yourself to understand but the federal law grants states their powers, as it is composed of the states. It's okay civics aint for everyone.
I suppose you were instead referring to that totally meaningless pandering part of the Destruction of Marriage Act where Congress purports to tell the states that they don't have to recognize marriages from other states that they don't like. That was meaningless because the Full Faith and Credit Clause doesn't require states to recognize acts of other states that contravene their public policy. It was also meaningless because Congress doesn't have the authority to restrict the effect of the Full Faith and Credit Clause in the first place.
No I was talking about the whole thing. how it defines marriage as something that is not same sex, and reaffirm full faith and credit.
What's more, nothing in DOMA contradicts the fact that states are not free to enact statutes relating to marriage that are unconstitutional, which was my point when I mentioned Loving v. Virginia.
funny then, that many states have it in their state constitutions, what the definition of marriage is. It is kind of hard to be unconstitutional when it is in your constitution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by subbie, posted 02-14-2012 4:08 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 262 by subbie, posted 02-15-2012 11:14 AM Artemis Entreri has replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 284 of 759 (653162)
02-18-2012 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 262 by subbie
02-15-2012 11:14 AM


can you stay on topic in this thread.
yeah I thought not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by subbie, posted 02-15-2012 11:14 AM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by subbie, posted 02-18-2012 6:59 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 285 of 759 (653163)
02-18-2012 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 266 by Taz
02-16-2012 5:37 PM


and you wonder why?
look at how y'all talk about the opposition, do you want to change hearts and minds or just tell people what to do? (the answer is obvious from reading this thread)
I know I know you are right about everything and those who disagree are morons. nothing new same old liberals.
nonukes writes:
We still have politicians in power who believe that the civil rights act of 1964 should never have been enacted.
well it is not constitutional as much as it is politically correct. The 1964 Act is significant because it marks a time were feel-good politically correct policies begin to outweigh the constitution, and no one cares. It is a catch 22, because in defending the constitution one becomes a racist. so what is more important, doing the right thing, or not being called names?
Edited by Artemis Entreri, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by Taz, posted 02-16-2012 5:37 PM Taz has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 299 of 759 (653646)
02-23-2012 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 287 by subbie
02-18-2012 6:59 PM


Re: Grow up
you don't either.
everything you accuse me of you are also guilty of,
talk about telling.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 287 by subbie, posted 02-18-2012 6:59 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by subbie, posted 02-23-2012 11:19 AM Artemis Entreri has not replied
 Message 301 by Theodoric, posted 02-23-2012 12:50 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4219 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 322 of 759 (654897)
03-05-2012 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 321 by onifre
03-02-2012 9:57 AM


Re: I ain't no stinking Mexican
I thought that was because JFK?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by onifre, posted 03-02-2012 9:57 AM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 323 by onifre, posted 03-05-2012 7:58 PM Artemis Entreri has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024