Help me understand Intelligent Design (part 2)

At best, intelligent design can be called "junk science". No evidence has ever been found to lend any credence to the theory. While I do support evolution whole-heartedly, even the creationists have at least the Bible to lend credence to their argument (if you choose to interpret it literally). Intelligent Design is just a feel-good theory invented by those who fear of the consequences of not believing in the Bible, yet still think evolution makes sense. I feel that ID is just an attempt to split the difference between a fully scientific and a fully religious view of the origin of man.