Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Monetary Tsunami In America!!
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 92 of 121 (611112)
04-05-2011 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by jar
04-04-2011 8:36 PM


jar writes:
And it could be addressed easily and quickly by removing the exempted industries from the minimum wage laws, and by setting minimum wages as a percentage of the poverty level instead of a specific dollar amount.
Hopefully that percentage would be at least 100% of the poverty level!

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by jar, posted 04-04-2011 8:36 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by jar, posted 04-05-2011 2:25 PM xongsmith has replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 94 of 121 (611120)
04-05-2011 3:36 PM


The American Dollar
I've been looking at the Consumer Price Index, the Cost of Living and the Federal Poverty Level and in the end focused on the CPI with this table:
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt
In various places here Buzsaw has made a claim to go back to the Gold Standard from whatever is now.
I have always thought that easiest way to stop inflation cold in it's tracks was to renormalize it every year or some other recurring period, even as coarsely grained as the US Census intervals.
Base the value of the American dollar directly on the CPI, a basket of goods & services typical of the American family. The methodology of determining this basket is very complex and already well-thought out. This is what a dollar will buy - the same basket of goods (contents vastly changing year by year due to technology, but under the watchful eye of the Bureau of Labor Statistics that the Fortune 500 uses).
Problem ended.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by crashfrog, posted 04-05-2011 5:56 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 95 of 121 (611121)
04-05-2011 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by jar
04-05-2011 2:25 PM


jar writes:
Kinda, more likely based on the annual poverty level / normal annual hours worked.
The annual poverty level is based on a single wage earner working 40 hours per week, so it's a system constant of 2080 hours every time in your divisor.

- xongsmith, 5.7d

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by jar, posted 04-05-2011 2:25 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024