Does the bible condemn homosexuality?

What does MONEY have to do with it. I went on RADIO out of Providence on the longest lasting gay radio show with an open BIBLE at paYPhone only to find the gay hosts both male and female on the other end listening to me simply READ passages. All had ears. There were no clingons etc. In the end the one host refused to talk and the other simply said I made the listener's "head" spin. All I did was read the BIBLE. HOw hard is that? And on Air yet. Propganda is irrelevant. My father was in public relations all his life explaining why ATT was replacing workers with telephones and later why UCF was always correct even if Syracuse had a better Quaterback but I am not back yet more later.

Hume's journey to understand cause and effect is far from clearly applicable as far as I can read the English in "up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the women, burned in their lust toward one another; men with men working that which is unseemly ". Perhaps another language scholar could inform??I read THE WOMEN DID CHANGE...
MEN WITH MEN WORKING... with an AND. In other words, X exressed differently than Y. I know I do not "need:" to insist on reading it like this but are the non-English words clear as these passages implying SEXUAL CHANGES and not merely a DIFFERENCE IN sex? And further that any change is behvioral and not simply physiological?I mean to have the questions answered WITHIN the verses not without. I KNOW one can really read this more clearly by changing focus to a larger segement of the text. That is not the intent of these particular questions here.[This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 09-23-2003]