Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Book: Kerry ‘Unfit for Command’
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 477 of 612 (139223)
09-02-2004 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 476 by ThingsChange
09-02-2004 1:24 PM


Re: McCain is pandering to both sides
Things Change writes:
opinion that Bush is the better leader AT THIS ELECTION than Kerry.
don't really think he respects Kerry for his anti-Vietnam actions and words, but he knows he needs ...
In the ABC interview cited he said that both were suitable leaders, his response was faster and less equivocal of Kerry than it was of Bush.
Peter Jennings also noted in the interview that McCain and Kerry were long time friends, built mainly from working together on veteran issues many years in congress. If he resented the anti-war issue he must have overcome it.
The interview is available at
http://abcnews.go.com/...ight/mccain_interview_040830-8.html
Here are some excerpts, but they don't give you the nuance of the way they were said. There is a video link as well.
ABC writes:
JENNINGS: Do you take some satisfaction from the fact that the Bush administration now needs you?
McCAIN: No, I don't. I think what I have to look at is the future of the country. I am a friend of John Kerry's. I think he'd be a good president. I think this president proved himself with his leadership after Sept. 11th, and his strength, and his ability to lead the country.
JENNINGS: Do you think the president has been the uniter, which he promised to be at the convention four years ago?
McCAIN: No. But I'm not sure how much of it is his fault. And I'm sure that some of it's his fault, okay? But we have this bitterness from the Clinton impeachment, from the Florida election. He didn't have anything to do with the chads. We have a more bitterly partisan Congress and nation than I've ever seen, and it's regrettable. And I believe that the president, after he's reelected, will try to fix that.
JENNINGS: George Bush's political party, as we'll call it, is, among other things, is not well disposed to Senator McCAIN. And it is argued by some that your embrace of President Bush, in this campaign, is really a recalculation of your own political self-interest.
McCAIN: You know, I hope that most of the people who have known me for the last 22 years that I've been in public office wouldn't believe that. Because I think most Americans that know me, and my constituents in Arizona do, that I try to do what's right. And many times that has not been popular, particularly at first. But my goal right now is to be reelected to the Senate. Am I confident of reelection? Yes. Do the people of Arizona expect me to seek their support and campaign for it? Yes.
JENNINGS: Do you think Kerry has made a serious miscalculation by making his Vietnam experience as big a deal as he has?
McCAIN: I believe that it was probably a mistake to emphasize it as much as he did. I believe the reason why he did, so that they could inoculate themselves against the "Dukakis in the tank" routine. And perhaps they overplayed their hand. But it's awful easy for me to sit on the sidelines. In South Carolina, which you referred to, I way overreacted. Way overreacted to the things that were said about me. So I'm sure no expert on how to do it right.
JENNINGS: Is [Kerry] not strong enough to be president?
McCAIN: I think he's strong enough to be president. I just believe that President Bush has already proven his leadership by his conduct of himself and leadership of this country after Sept. 11th.
JENNINGS: Is John Kerry able to handle foreign affairs as well as President Bush?
McCAIN: I would think he would handle it well. But again, I give the same answer about leadership. I think the president has proven leadership.
JENNINGS: We've got X-days left until the election itself. Are you disappointed that so much of the time has been given to this Swift Boat controversy [that attacked Kerry's war record], and not enough to other issues, which you believe profoundly in?
McCAIN: I'm terribly disappointed. Today, probably a young American will die in Iraq tragically. And instead of trying to work together, or apart, trying to resolve how we can win this conflict in Iraq, which is by no means certain, we're going back and refighting a war that we can't erase a single name from the Vietnam War memorial. And I think it's just terrible, and I know a lot of veterans, who are 18-, 19-, 20-year-old kids. They fought honorably. They came home. And they were not well-treated by their fellow citizens. That dramatically exacerbated their problems. Some of them still haven't come all the way home. So we're reopening all of those wounds, and I'm deeply, deeply disturbed about it.
JENNINGS: Do you think there has been some miscalculation in Iraq?
McCAIN: Sure. And I complained about them at the time.
JENNINGS: And what do you think it has been?
McCAIN: I think that we didn't anticipate, as the president just said, the challenges that we face in the quote, post-combat phase. And I implore Secretary Rumsfeld to send more troops. But one of the reasons why we avoid wars, is because mistakes are made in wars. Gen. MacArthur told Harry Truman that the Chinese would not evade invade Korea. We always make mistakes.
JENNINGS: Can you tell me specifically what mistakes you think were made?
McCAIN: Specifically, we allowed the looting. We should have shot the looters immediately, which [would not have] created an environment of lawlessness. We obviously should have understood that we had to have more troops there in the way of linguists and special forces, and civil affairs people. We should have probably made a transition to an Iraqi government sooner rather than later. But the point is, you make mistakes, you recognize the mistakes, and you fix them. That's what we need to do.
JENNINGS: Anything else you want to say?
McCAIN: I believe that my party needs to go back more to the principles of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, my two personal heroes particularly on environmental issues. I believe that climate change is real. I think we need to address it in a more meaningful fashion. I think that we need to probably recognize that there are severe problems out there economically, and otherwise amongst lower income Americans. We've just seen those statistics.
enjoy.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 09-02-2004 02:38 PM

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 476 by ThingsChange, posted 09-02-2004 1:24 PM ThingsChange has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 479 of 612 (139311)
09-02-2004 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 478 by ThingsChange
09-02-2004 7:34 PM


Bus has not been in leader when in position
Managing a football team is leadership? WOW.
Governor for six dismal years where he takes credit for a bill he vetoed and then was pass to over-ride his veto ... another good example.
It's the official policy of the RNC that Bush is a good leader because he just happened to be president when the sky fell ...
People forget the first attack on the world trade towers, and when Clinton went after OBL the repubs were against it .. it was "wagging the dog" .. it was "trying to distract attention from monica" .. it was bad foreign policy ...
If his being in charge is such good evidence of leadership why
(1) did we invade Iraq after insulting all our allies
(2) aren't the soldiers home yet when - originally - it was supposed to be a short, heavily celebrated victory and departure?
(3) arent' the soldeirs home yet -- on the revised time-table
(4) arent' the soldiers home yet --- on the re-revised time table
(5) are more soldiers being sent over than were there for the war due to another revision of "the plan" (is there one?)
(6) are all the reasons for going into Iraq shown blatantly to be non-existent
(7) what he has done on the economy has unnecessarily put the nation much deeper in debt
(8) has he cut benefits to the soldiers doing his dirty work, while their service is extended and extended
WHAT DOES FAILURE LOOK LIKE?
It is also offical RNC policy that the reason for going to war is the fact that we are there now ... doesn't anybody else see what is wrong with that thinking?
WHAT DOES INCOMPETENCE LOOK LIKE?
He doesn't deserve a single rational vote. And I'm not sure he will get one.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 478 by ThingsChange, posted 09-02-2004 7:34 PM ThingsChange has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 481 by Trump won, posted 09-02-2004 10:25 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 486 of 612 (139427)
09-03-2004 12:56 AM
Reply to: Message 481 by Trump won
09-02-2004 10:25 PM


Re: Bus has not been in leader when in position
heh. I "corrected it from baseball to football. my bad
I find most american preoccupation with sports rather amusing and non-productive - I'd rather play than watch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 481 by Trump won, posted 09-02-2004 10:25 PM Trump won has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 487 of 612 (139430)
09-03-2004 1:01 AM
Reply to: Message 482 by joshua221
09-02-2004 10:34 PM


well it's official the hard drive went south and all on it is lost. fortunately for me the worst of the loss is bookmarks and not work (whew)
I dont' think 911 would have changed seniors approach to Iraq. It may have made him even less likely to go in (a) knowing what a rats nest it would become (read his book on this) and (b) not wanting to spread his troops out too far when they would be needed for afganistan.
Pop was head of the CIA and would have paid better attention to the 'spooks'

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 482 by joshua221, posted 09-02-2004 10:34 PM joshua221 has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 488 of 612 (139431)
09-03-2004 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 484 by Adminnemooseus
09-02-2004 10:51 PM


Re: May close this topic later tonight
can you talk about attacks on Kery and not talk about Bush?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 484 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-02-2004 10:51 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 510 of 612 (139785)
09-03-2004 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 508 by ThingsChange
09-03-2004 6:07 PM


but aren't you concerned?
This whole concept doesn't give you some misgivings, some concerns? That a "conservative legal watchdog group" (run by? funded by?) wants to launch a legal investigation by people under the administration against his opponent?
Do you ever get the opinion that the neocons will stoop to what ever tawdry measure is necessary no matter how immoral, innapropriat or unamerican it is?
The hypocrisy of this is just boggling. This is worse that the Clinton witch-hunt. I am appalled and I fear for America if this goes ahead.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 508 by ThingsChange, posted 09-03-2004 6:07 PM ThingsChange has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 511 by ThingsChange, posted 09-04-2004 12:28 AM RAZD has replied
 Message 518 by patriot0717, posted 09-05-2004 10:05 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 512 of 612 (139797)
09-04-2004 12:53 AM
Reply to: Message 511 by ThingsChange
09-04-2004 12:28 AM


Re: but aren't you concerned?
This is orchestrated just as the SBV was to distract people's attention from the fact that Bush has no program for the future other than to give away more money from the treasury.
The innuendo is enough for their purposes, they don't need to prove the case or take it to fruition, and letting bush appear magnanomous about stopping the investigation would just let it fester without the final word that would show it to be false.
I repeat -- doesn't it disturb you that such tactics are being used? Do you want someone for president that needs that to win?
This is more than spinning news, this is evil.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 511 by ThingsChange, posted 09-04-2004 12:28 AM ThingsChange has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 562 by ThingsChange, posted 09-07-2004 10:14 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 514 of 612 (139856)
09-04-2004 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 513 by ThingsChange
09-04-2004 1:07 AM


Re: Interpretation of events
I don't see abuse of Patriot Act. I think it is worth it to battle terrorism, which you still don't seem to think is a big threat.
quote:
"Anyone who gives up rights in exchange for security deserves neither" -- Benjamin Franklin
The threat of terrorism is not as great as shrub and his cohorts would like to terrify you into believing so you will re-elect him. It is real, no question, but the FIRST time they attacked us on American soil, the republican party told Clinton to back off.
Their analysis of what is going to be a threat has been consistently wrong. When there is information on what a target would be it is one they have not anticipated. The recent information on the targeting of the stock exchange makes my point here, while they have been saying it will be large gatherings of people.
One can be used to terrorize a population by the politicians who want to get re-elected, the other by people who want to damage the US economic system that is impacting their country.
Enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 513 by ThingsChange, posted 09-04-2004 1:07 AM ThingsChange has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 572 by ThingsChange, posted 09-08-2004 12:08 AM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 519 of 612 (140210)
09-06-2004 12:53 AM
Reply to: Message 518 by patriot0717
09-05-2004 10:05 PM


Re: but aren't you concerned?
Try this on for size, received in e-mail:
The 14 Defining Characteristics Of Fascism, by Dr. Lawrence Britt
Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made ore rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.
6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
It takes people with intentional blinders to ignore this trend.
I would say "enjoy" but this is not for pleasurable thinking.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 518 by patriot0717, posted 09-05-2004 10:05 PM patriot0717 has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 530 of 612 (140363)
09-06-2004 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 529 by johnfolton
09-06-2004 1:23 PM


why not go all the way and question the "V" with the bronze star?
perhaps the clerk typing all those DD214's has been typing "Bronze Star with combat V" all day.
The relevant point is that Kerry is not claiming his Silver Star came with a V but that he got the silver star and actually shows his finall DD214 on the website.
Now what about Shrubs DD214 .... ever see that one?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 529 by johnfolton, posted 09-06-2004 1:23 PM johnfolton has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 532 of 612 (140422)
09-06-2004 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 531 by patriot0717
09-06-2004 4:05 PM


Re: Bush is still a liar and now you are joining him
the "I'm glad you agree" is one of whatever's favorite troll type posts and yes it is dishonest, but hey - it's the best he can do without admiting his own errors.
trolls just want others to respond, not have a rational debate.
nice links (for the rational people ... heh)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 531 by patriot0717, posted 09-06-2004 4:05 PM patriot0717 has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 546 of 612 (140646)
09-07-2004 11:30 AM
Reply to: Message 543 by patriot0717
09-07-2004 8:12 AM


How to win America back from the neoCONs
1. We're in Iraq. Maybe we shouldn't have gone in the first place or maybe we should have - but that's another question that has more to do with placing blame than fixing the problem. If we pack up and leave tomorrow, we leave Iraq in chaos. What do you think should be our criteria for turning the country back over to the Iraqis and how long do you think it should take?
2. What steps do you think should be taken to prevent Cheney from siphoning off billions of dollars into his Haliburton bank account via the Iraq war?
3. How do we stop Bu$h from raiding the social security fund and then eliminating the program all together?
(1) admit that a mistake was made and that we will work to fix it, including prosecuting those responsible for it. Then calling in Iraqi and international help to ensure that it is done correctly.
(2) impeach him
(3) defeat him
K?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 543 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 8:12 AM patriot0717 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 548 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 1:06 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 550 of 612 (140702)
09-07-2004 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 548 by patriot0717
09-07-2004 1:06 PM


Re: How to win America back from the neoCONs
I like the idea od appointing an independent counsel to investigate corruption in the administration.
Perhaps that is why the neocons went to such lengths with Ken Star to ensure that the concept was so totally discredited. It wasn't just that they wanted to nail Clinton, they wanted to pervert the process.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 548 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 1:06 PM patriot0717 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 551 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 5:22 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 552 of 612 (140750)
09-07-2004 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 551 by patriot0717
09-07-2004 5:22 PM


Re: How to restore American Democracy
The main problem I saw with the old law was who "hired" the Independent Counsel -- the party in power? That'll be fair and unbiased!
I think it should come under the Justice Department, which should be under the Supreme Court ... and they should also be the ones suggesting judge appointments. That would make it more of a check and balance on the politicians.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 551 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 5:22 PM patriot0717 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 554 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 7:19 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 566 of 612 (140837)
09-07-2004 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 554 by patriot0717
09-07-2004 7:19 PM


Re: How to restore American Democracy
... a committee formed from an equal number ...
... only after they decided to "hire" one.
Do you mean judges for the investigation? Maybe. If you mean appointments for Supreme Court Justices and other court appointments
Not for the Supreme Court, no: that is a constitutional provision for one. Yes, I think having them make recommendations to Congress for suitable Federal Judges to serve a 4? 6? year term rather than a president with a lot of political strings to pay off would improve the level of judges and reduce the political partisanship that means an understaffed justice system, which hurts everyone. And it would have to be a Majority of the SC to recommend the list.
Would Scalia or Thomas be worse than Bush?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 554 by patriot0717, posted 09-07-2004 7:19 PM patriot0717 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024