Giant People in the bible?

Okay, I've been had. Can you give me any info proving that I have been had? I have not found one article showing that that site is a hoaxy site. Until you can prove the site faulty, it is innocent.It is amusing to see many of you belittle a site, but have nothing official disproving it....Oh..but wait...I forgot "I've been had!" *runs away in terror*

---

~Lysimachus

I'm not talking about the site persay, but the article. The same article is elsewhere on the net. Just do a google search. Yes, news sources make faulty advertizings, but there are times when faulty sites make genuine advertizings. It's the data that needs to be analyzed, not the site.And no need to feel sorry for me folks. I feel sorry that you are incapable of embarking on these discussions more intelligently, as you've all been had that Ron Wyatt is a fraud. Now this I am 100% certain of, as I have the offical governent papers to back up my claims. I'm just waiting for the moment to speil my information.Your attitude toward what I have will demonstrate who's really "been had".Spare me, as I've experienced enough of your "opportunist" tactics on me (Charles). The work in helping to unveil the simple facts of creationism is already as inextricable as it gets, so to get you to accept that perhaps giant bones exist is like teaching a chimpanzee trinogometry.

---

~Lysimachus

Don't worry Charles Knight, I'm not taken in by them 100% by them as you think. I'm simply more willing to give them a benefit of the doubt as long as their is no 100% accurate proof against it. There are a lot of uncovered things in this world...things that will one day be revealed. There are also a lot of "good" things that the world likes to cover. Secret things are held everywhere and are not released to the public ear (especially in its accuracy and entirety), so therefore, not only should we be skeptical against a claim, but we should also be skeptical against the claims against it.I trust you respect and are willing to understand my style of approach.

quote:

---

em... You? Quite clearly you? really really clearly YOU?

---

I'm willing to admit that I might have been had, had I accepted the claim 100%. But this is not the case. As for the claim itself, like I said, I'm willing to give it a benefit of the doubt, but as for trusting the site itself...now that's a different story.Anything other than Ron Wyatt's discoveries...there is a high percentage that I could "be had". But regarding Ron's discoveries themselves, I guarantee you 100% that I haven't, as I have been exposed full force to the truths and lies spread to the world regarding them, and am right in the lime light of information. I have personal connections with not only several witnesses, but also contributers and workers themselves involved with W.A.R. Just be patient, and I will take the time to thoroughly provide and document much uncovered information to the public online. Even your questions regarding the Ark of the Covenant and the blood *now that is a touchy subject, and very hard for people to swallow, but once closely investigated, one will realize that the idea is a far cry from being a scam*This message has been edited by Lysimachus, 09-21-2004 09:52 AM

---

~Lysimachus

You honestly think I haven't read it? Wow, look is calling the kettle black when it comes to making up stuff.The truth is, all of your so called "debunking" is all but foolishness, and a far cry from the real truth. You have no clue whatsoever what was involved with the blood.Ron Wyatt was NOT a FRAUD, PERIOD. No matter how many times you repeat it, it isn't going to change the facts Charles. You're deceived and blinder than a bat. You've been had, and you don't want to see it. These are the most extraordinary discoveries of all time. Surveys conducted show a global acceptance and positive response to these discoveries...Critics will NEVER be able to prove them a fraud...instead, as time progresses, the critics will continue to find themselves deeper in the hole.I also am notorious for dealing with one subject at a time. Step 1. Next, Step 2. Next, Step 3. Obviously, you are unreasonable enough that I should deal with all three steps simulaneously? No my friend, my next project is smack straight at Noah's Ark. I'll come to the Ark of the Covenant and create a thread regarding that in due season.Be reasonable, and quit fuming. It's only fogging your mind. Perhaps you need defogging fluid? I have plenty of it.

---

~Lysimachus

Charles, I just got my cast off! I've been incapacitated since June 5th, and traveling 3 hrs. to the hospital often does not make it easy. I also have a social life other than the internet. Also, it is important to get facts straight before attempting to just throw data without providing it in any consistent or organized approach.

---

~Lysimachus