Too Many Meteor Strikes in 6k Years

look it up. it leveled a good section of the siberian forests, in a giant radial pattern. it was witnessed entering the atmosphere from miles away. i don't think it left a crater though, it wasn't pic enough. the was seen to have exploded before it hit the ground.as for how many died, i think something on the order of a dozen. but not many people live in the siberian wilderness.

---

אָרַח

Not all countries have as many geologists as Australia, U.S., Europe.Not all countries care enough about bolide impacts to look for them.Not all countries have geologists who are familiar enough with what bolide impacts look like in the field.Not all countries have the resources to send their geologists out to the field to look specifically for bolide impacts.Not all countries are in direct communication with the people at Earth Impact Database.Not all impacts occur on the surface of the earth, and the ones occurring in the subsurface would be extremely difficult to find, much less identify. One that has been found: Alamo ImpactSome impacts even occur on land covered by flowing ice.Hundreds of bolide impacts during the flood year would most certainly be noticed by someone floating about the ocean.

Well, how many of these and where are they located? The flood saturated everything down to bedrock. I figure the wet earth would keep down the dust and debris factor. To some extent that must be the case, certainly with the smaller ones. And if they impacted under water, all the more so. I'm simply guessing they were associated with the whole catastrophe of the flood, both during and afterward for some time -- how long afterward -???? I'm not trying to account for every hit. Not following you. But I'm a YEC remember.

the k-t event hit deep water. it still killed something like 90% of the life on earth. like i said, water doesn't stick around in temperatures of several thousand degrees. it also didn't leave a crater. we're talking about things that actually make craters, and some of them several hundred miles wide (like the k-t one). so the example of effects similar to a small nuclear bomb is rather magified with the bigger rocks that we're talking about. ok, well, what do you suppose would happen if a planet-buster hit us? flood or not. you think an asteroid measured in cubic MILES would make a huge dent in the earth, and NOT kick up dust?

---

אָרַח

Does this not this open a bigger problem? Noah manages to breath steam and avoids being cooked alive (during the flood), THEN a giant rock hits the earth...Was Noah maybe a Kryptonian?Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's QuestionsThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 23-May-2005 02:28 PM

Oh does it? Just how is that? How much energy from a 5 km wide asteroid will 5 km of water dissappate? How much steam will be released into the atmosphere. How big will the tsunami be and how far will it travel in an uninterupted world ocean? Uh the tunkuska event was caused by one of the tiny, little dust specs things that come in very frequently. Things of only 100's of tons. Only the equivalent of about 1/100 of Barringer (or about 10 hiroshimas). These baby's occur about once every 100 years. These are not the ones we are talking about here.But google it and get an idea of the size of this 'eensy teeny' comet did. No so far you have just been told what they do. If you do some googling you will find out what the big impactors do. And water doesn't help.

Maybe he noticed them then.

making stuff up again, i see. still, these things VAPORIZE rock several hundred meter deep. water or not. water would be LESS resistance than rock.

---

אָרַח

Well he was a pretty strong old guy. He was 600 years old when the flood hit and he lived to be 950.

no. meteors kill even superman, remember?

---

אָרַח

You should talk. Uh huh, but the debris therefrom would be somewhat dissipated by the water, no?

yes but since a worldwide flood requires him to be able to resist the superheat that it would cause - it is slightly more than being a "pretty strong old guy"

no, not enoughThis message has been edited by NosyNed, 05-23-2005 02:35 PM

yes, i AM talking. and i'm saying that you're making up stuff again.see, at least the sort of things i'm discussing are all backed by science and evidence. you can't even say the same for the bible. you're making up stuff to defend the bible in a COMPLETELY unbiblical fashion. you mean the water that's several thousand degrees?

heck, it's slightly more than superman.

---

אָרַח