Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Too Many Meteor Strikes in 6k Years
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3735 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 63 of 304 (210692)
05-23-2005 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Faith
05-23-2005 4:12 PM


Re: Not 6000 years, 4000.
I've had another look at the opening post of this thread and, while it does seem a bit garbled, it seems to be suggesting that the number of detected large strikes occurring over 6-10K years would have wiped out humanity. I have to say that this does make sense, since humanity would have been "in at the beginning" so to speak if we take the Genesis version of creation literally.
Faith, you're proposing an even more extreme scenario - that all of the mega strikes happened in a single year!!! To back this up you're going to have to tackle the physics of meteorite strikes of this magnitude and that doesn't belong in the faith section, it belongs in the science section. You can't just take the flood as a "given" - its up to you to provide evidence that numerous huge meteorite strikes in water wouldn't have par-boiled Noah and his floating menagerie.
I'm enjoying the science in this thread so far and I would hate to see it disappear into faith section where the science stops and the wild guessing begins.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 4:12 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by 1.61803, posted 05-23-2005 4:55 PM Trixie has not replied
 Message 65 by Brad McFall, posted 05-23-2005 4:57 PM Trixie has replied
 Message 79 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 9:08 PM Trixie has not replied
 Message 127 by macaroniandcheese, posted 05-25-2005 12:40 PM Trixie has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3735 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 66 of 304 (210700)
05-23-2005 5:05 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Brad McFall
05-23-2005 4:57 PM


Re: Center for NEO Studies
Thank you Brad. I've got the site bookmarked for further reading.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Brad McFall, posted 05-23-2005 4:57 PM Brad McFall has not replied

Trixie
Member (Idle past 3735 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 68 of 304 (210714)
05-23-2005 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Faith
05-23-2005 2:33 PM


Re: Guessing?
Faith, you may find this web site useful
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/
You can look up some historical impacts then plug the parameters of them into the boxes on this site and get a description of the effects. A 10km meteorite impacting in water of 1000m depth causes problems at a distance of 1000km and we're not talking little effects. For example, there seems to be enough heat generated to ignite clothing, trees and grass and most of the body suffers third degree burns. You can play with the parameters, altering the distance from impact site to see how far away these rather lethal effects will be experienced. You can change the depth of the water, the size of the meteorite, heck, even its composition.
This might help you to formulate your theory in more scientific terms. Enjoy!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 05-23-2005 2:33 PM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024