Fossils - Exposing the Evolutionist slight-of-hand

"Again I say it is a matter of intelligence.. would not the more intelligent creatures go for higher ground?"Ah yes, those clever little angiosperms, obviously much smarter than gymnosperms. That is the obvious reason why gymnosperms first appear much lower in that strata than angiosperms.I wonder why sloths don't appear in the lower strata. Yes, they are reasonably intelligent mammals but not very quick, in fact a lot slower than many small dinosaurs appeared to be.Why do we not find fossils of flightless birds well below the strata where we first find flighted birds?I'm afraid, Nimlore, that you are simply making up stories which are contradicted by the scientific evidence so that you can hold onto your own peculiar religious beliefs.

quote:

---

Originally posted by NimLore:
well I have faith that they are there...

---

Well, I can't imagine why. All of the patterns which I mentioned, which are inconsistent with your flood fairytale, are present in the fossil record. So, you have faith that an out-of-place fossil will eventually turn up. It must be faith because there is no reason behind it. [b][quote]similar to the naturalists faith of a transitional fossil...[/b][/quote]No, the many transitional fossils exist, no faith is involved. [b][quote]I will let your own sarcasms against me be your judge.
I forgive you allready.[/B][/QUOTE]The sarcasm was directed at your nonsense fairytale which you presented to support your religious view. However examples such as gymnosperms and sloths contradict your fairytale.

Fred has not been active on this site for many months. He did reappear for a brief time but when asked to continue with certain issues addressed to him he quickly disappeared.Don't hold your breath in anticipation of a response from Fred.