Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fossils - Exposing the Evolutionist slight-of-hand
MrHambre
Member (Idle past 1422 days)
Posts: 1495
From: Framingham, MA, USA
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 72 of 90 (50237)
08-12-2003 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Percy
08-12-2003 4:21 PM


Come Again?
Michael Behe's position on Darwinism:
"Although Darwin’s mechanismnatural selection working on variationmight explain many things, however, I do not think it explains molecular life. I also do not think it surprising that the new science of the very small might change the way we view the less small."
Darwin's Black Box, p.6
If I understand Behe here, he's saying that he accepts the answers Darwinism provides for many phenomena. However, since he doubts that Darwinism applies to molecular life, that may mean that Darwinism doesn't apply at all.
Is this the same guy who's fond of criticizing Darwinists for their reductionism?
------------------
En la tierra de ciegos, el tuerto es el Rey.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Percy, posted 08-12-2003 4:21 PM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024