Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hurricanes defying conventional science.
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 7 of 100 (265588)
12-04-2005 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by randman
12-04-2005 5:12 PM


I'm a bit ignorant on hurricanes because of where I live (I'll never have to worry about those buggers). Tell me how they defy conventional models.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by randman, posted 12-04-2005 5:12 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by randman, posted 12-04-2005 11:41 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 11 by jar, posted 12-04-2005 11:42 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 13 of 100 (265596)
12-04-2005 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by randman
12-04-2005 11:41 PM


Re: 2 hurricanes
randman writes:
Of course, it is a growing and learning area of science, but these 2 hurricanes were shockers, and they are trying to figure out how to incorporate their behaviour for future models.
So... what's your point?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by randman, posted 12-04-2005 11:41 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by randman, posted 12-04-2005 11:51 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 17 of 100 (265601)
12-04-2005 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by randman
12-04-2005 11:51 PM


Re: 2 hurricanes
Randman, being one of your fans, I am certain that you did not open up this thread just to make that statement. You're implying something. I'm really bad with reading between the lines, so just tell me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by randman, posted 12-04-2005 11:51 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 12:00 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 33 of 100 (265620)
12-05-2005 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by randman
12-05-2005 12:00 AM


Re: 2 hurricanes
While I'm not meteorologist, I have studied for quite a bit about chaotic systems. The weather is a chaotic system. Because of this, it wouldn't suprise me if we encounter anomolous data that do not fit into our model.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 12:00 AM randman has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 43 of 100 (265634)
12-05-2005 12:55 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by Rrhain
12-05-2005 12:36 AM


Re: Black-and-white thinking
Rrhain writes:
It's as if upon watching two mathematicians argue over whether or not the six millionth decimal of pi is a 2 or not, that must mean that pi is really an integer.
You mean it's not an integer?
On a serious note, there's a reason why chaotic systems are called chaotic. A slight change in any of the infinite variables could dramatically change the result. This is why we refer to it as the butterfly effect. A butterfly could flap it's wing in Brazil and cause a hurricane in the north atlantic.
I think this is an area in science that most people are uncomfortable with. People have always been able to go to bed "knowing" that science is all about repeatability and predictability. Unfortunately, nonlinear systems defy this belief. Rather than giving a definite answer, like "on this day and time the hurricane will do this and this... there see I told you so," we are now forced to say "we have reason to believe that on this day and time the hurricane will have so and so chance that it will do this and so and so chance that it will do that..."
In a way, we can't really blame people for being uncomfortable with what modern science tells us. Unlike classical science, we can no longer predict the future. It's pretty scary. The best we could do is predict what it will probably do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Rrhain, posted 12-05-2005 12:36 AM Rrhain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 8:58 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 59 of 100 (265737)
12-05-2005 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by randman
12-05-2005 8:58 AM


Re: Black-and-white thinking
randman writes:
The issue here is what nonlinear effects, if any, are involved, and can we figure out what they are.
You seem to not understand what nonlinear dynamics involve. Trust me, the weather, like most systems in the universe, are chaotic in nature and are very hard to predict. A child could literally start a hurricane by sneezing.
A better example of a nonlinear chaotic system to visualize is the double pendulum. The single pendulum motion is easy to predict. We actually have an equation for it where we input a couple of variables and have an output. The double pendulum, however, is chaotic and is impossible to predict. The best anyone could do is predict the probability of what might happen next. It's pretty scary.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 8:58 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 11:20 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 61 of 100 (265742)
12-05-2005 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by randman
12-05-2005 11:07 AM


Re: Black-and-white thinking
randman writes:
There is no dispute as to that, nor that it is very surprising. The issue is why.
That's not how chaotic systems work. You can't point out any variable or any number of variables as a cause for a particular behavior in a chaotic system. In this particular case, people like myself could literally assume that goddunit is just as good an explanation as any other.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 11:07 AM randman has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 63 of 100 (265746)
12-05-2005 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Hangdawg13
12-05-2005 10:41 AM


There was a stargate sg1 episode where a rogue off-world team steals a weather device from a planet far, far away. The device is used by the inhabitants of that planet to keep the weather from swallowing their planet. When the device was gone, BAM! the apocolypse on that planet began. The device was brought back on Earth and BAM! the world started to flood and stuff, since the device was calibrated for another planet.
In star trek, however, controlling the weather isn't much of a problem. They actually control every aspect of the weather and people live happily ever after... until a group of extremists sabotage the weather control system and caused heavy rain for 1 measely day, ruining people's vacation and life on Earth as we know it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Hangdawg13, posted 12-05-2005 10:41 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 64 of 100 (265748)
12-05-2005 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by randman
12-05-2005 11:20 AM


Re: Black-and-white thinking
rand writes:
On the child sneezing, isn't that a bit of a stretch?
No, it's not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 11:20 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 11:31 AM coffee_addict has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 66 of 100 (265758)
12-05-2005 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by randman
12-05-2005 11:31 AM


Re: Black-and-white thinking
randman writes:
I wouldn't think the system is that tightly wrapped that a sneeze could send it over the edge so to speak.
You are still thinking in terms of linear dynamics. Noone is claiming that it's tightly wrapped around a simple sneeze. The sneeze could cause a minute change in a minute system that expands over time causing a shift in a deciding factor, like the lyapunov exponent in some systems, of the bigger systems, which in turn could eventually affect the really big systems.
There was an episode in 7 Days that portrayed this very well. The hero of the story goes back in time exactly 7 days to save the world. The moment he was back, he uses all his money in his savings to bet on a team he knew would win a couple days later. Unfortunately for him, his very presence displaces some molecules that eventually causes a gust of win that causes his team to lose. You know what he said when a scientist explained to him the effects of his very presence? He said, "Oh shit, I just lost my life's savings."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by randman, posted 12-05-2005 11:31 AM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024