You probably make the claim. It is only that you attempt to soften the implication by saying that it happened over millions of years. Somehow the thought of slow gradualism will soften the premise. And the premise is that something non-human gave birth to a human. Long time is used to make it seem more plausible that a man descended from an ape.
All together now "YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND EVOLUTION!"
Okay,Okay, in all the pictures that scientists have artists draw for them, the ancestral creature LOOKS like an ape. So there.
1) Artists are not scientists.
2) It didn't happen "one day".
3) Gradualism is the only explanation and if you don't like it I'm sorry. How do you suppose we went from wolf to Chihuahua? hint: Gradualism.
When you take away all the padding of millions of years and imagined intermediate stages of Homo this and homo that and homo the other, what do you have basically? A non-human had to one day give birth to a human.
Nope. A population changed over time. Again Wolf -> Chihuahua. It happened, we did it. Little steps along the way. No reason we can't streatch the same thing over millions of years.
You can do what you want Yaro.
Oh, thank you.
I plan to open up a thread on the biblical teaching about what the effects of unbelief and rejection of God are on the normal function of the mind. Maybe we can kick some of it around there.
That actually sounds like a very fun topic. Please open it. If you want a GD I'm game.
I plan to call it something like "The Effects of Unbelief in God on the Mind" from the standpoint of the Bible's own statements about the matter.
Sure. Sounds like fun.
™ Version 4.2
